Review of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns for Mechanisms Modeling and Machine Learning Applications

Ground improvement for foundations supported on soft soils is traditionally problematic because of low bearing capacity and a large magnitude of settlement. One sustainable method for mitigating these problems is the use of stone columns (SCs), particularly geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs), to improve load transfer, confinement, and consolidation. This review critically synthesizes recent advances in the analysis and design of SC systems using experimental investigations, numerical simulations, and machine learning (ML)-based methodologies. The article indicates that GESCs, when integrated with modern data-driven techniques, especially hybrid metaheuristic ML models, represent a reliable and sustainable solution for soft soil stabilization. Traditional analytical and empirical methods remain useful; however, they are often inadequate for very soft soils (Undrained shear strength (cu) < 15 kPa), where excessive bulging and large deformations dominate system behavior. Consequently, intelligent hybrid modeling approaches are emerging as the next generation of optimized, data-driven design tools in geotechnical engineering. Different failure mechanisms of SCs, including bulging, punching shear, and general shear failure, are critically discussed along with the governing design parameters. Previous studies consistently indicate that spacing ratios within the range of s/D = 2–3 can improve the bearing capacity ratio (BCR) by approximately 50–100%. Numerical and experimental studies further demonstrate that SC systems can transfer nearly 60–80% of the applied load through stress concentration and soil arching mechanisms. Furthermore, the application of geosynthetic encasement enhances the performance of SCs in very soft soils by increasing confinement, reducing lateral deformation, and enhancing bearing capacity by nearly 3–6 times compared with ordinary SCs. The review also evaluates the growing role of artificial intelligence techniques in forecasting settlement and bearing capacity behavior. ML techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), XGBoost, and hybrid metaheuristic–ML models have shown high predictive capability, often achieving prediction errors below 5%. Despite these advancements, many existing ML studies still suffer from limited datasets, a lack of generalization, and insufficient incorporation of physical mechanisms.