Session 21. Oral Presentation for: Game-theoretical perspectives on global energy security: rivalry, cooperation, and institutional design

Presented on 20 May 2026: Session 21 Energy security in the 2020s is no longer defined primarily by physical resource abundance, but by the strategic behaviour of major powers, the interdependence of global markets and the institutional structures governing hydrocarbon trade and investment. Intensifying rivalry between the U.S. and China, combined with the policy choices of resource-rich middle powers such as Australia, is reshaping risk-sharing mechanisms and investment incentives across the global oil and gas system. This paper applies a game-theoretical framework to analyse vulnerabilities and cooperation pathways across three archetypes: (i) a U.S.–China ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ concerning energy flows and technological (and political) leverage; (ii) a ‘stag hunt’ between liquefied natural gas exporters and importers, where stable investment requires aligned expectations; and (iii) a triangular bargaining process between governments, international producers and domestic consumers in resource-rich jurisdictions. These games are set within a historical perspective on energy transitions, six structural mismatches in the global oil and gas system, and the strategic behaviour of five global energy power centres. The unsuccessful acquisition of Santos by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company is used as a case to illustrate these dynamics for a resource-rich middle power, Australia. We argue that energy security is determined less by reserves than by credible commitments, institutional design and the ability of states and companies to sustain robust interdependence under geopolitical stress. Our analysis suggests that durable stability requires a strategic shift from zero-sum rivalry towards repeated-game cooperation, anchored by transparent rules, diversified portfolios, shared infrastructure and policy mechanisms that dampen volatility and support predictable investment cycles. To access the Oral Presentation click ‘Supplementary data’ below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep26511
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 21. Oral Presentation for: Game-theoretical perspectives on global energy security: rivalry, cooperation, and institutional design

William Walton
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

Session 21. Oral Presentation for: Game-theoretical perspectives on global energy security: rivalry, cooperation, and institutional design

William Walton
article en

Abstract

Presented on 20 May 2026: Session 21 Energy security in the 2020s is no longer defined primarily by physical resource abundance, but by the strategic behaviour of major powers, the interdependence of global markets and the institutional structures governing hydrocarbon trade and investment. Intensifying rivalry between the U.S. and China, combined with the policy choices of resource-rich middle powers such as Australia, is reshaping risk-sharing mechanisms and investment incentives across the global oil and gas system. This paper applies a game-theoretical framework to analyse vulnerabilities and cooperation pathways across three archetypes: (i) a U.S.–China ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ concerning energy flows and technological (and political) leverage; (ii) a ‘stag hunt’ between liquefied natural gas exporters and importers, where stable investment requires aligned expectations; and (iii) a triangular bargaining process between governments, international producers and domestic consumers in resource-rich jurisdictions. These games are set within a historical perspective on energy transitions, six structural mismatches in the global oil and gas system, and the strategic behaviour of five global energy power centres. The unsuccessful acquisition of Santos by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company is used as a case to illustrate these dynamics for a resource-rich middle power, Australia. We argue that energy security is determined less by reserves than by credible commitments, institutional design and the ability of states and companies to sustain robust interdependence under geopolitical stress. Our analysis suggests that durable stability requires a strategic shift from zero-sum rivalry towards repeated-game cooperation, anchored by transparent rules, diversified portfolios, shared infrastructure and policy mechanisms that dampen volatility and support predictable investment cycles. To access the Oral Presentation click ‘Supplementary data’ below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 66(S2)
Department of the Premier and Cabinet (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.