Efficacy of a short multimodal workshop including stress management and communication skills training on objective structured clinical examination performance and exam-related anxiety in French medical students: a randomized controlled study

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of a short multimodal workshop, including stress-management and communication-skills training, on objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) performance and exam-related anxiety among medical students identified as needing additional support.Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial including fifth-year medical students with the lowest scores on an initial mock OSCE. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention group (stress management, communication training, and OSCE simulation) or the control group. OSCE examiners were blinded to group allocation. Anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State scale (STAI-State) before the intervention (T0), after the intervention (T1; intervention group only), and before the second mock OSCE (T2). OSCE scores and anxiety levels were compared between groups, and changes in anxiety over time were analyzed among students in the intervention group.Results: A total of 109 students were included in the per-protocol analysis (49 intervention, 60 control). Global OSCE scores at T2 did not differ between groups (median [interquartile range], 13.0/20 [11.9–14.3] vs. 13.3/20 [12.0–14.6]; between-group difference, 0.08 [95% confidence interval, −0.14 to 0.29]; P=0.50). Anxiety levels were moderate, with no significant between-group difference (STAI-State score, 47 [42–50], n=8, in the intervention group vs. 44 [42–46], n=12; P=0.32). A transient increase in situational anxiety was observed immediately after training in some intervention participants. No correlation was found between anxiety and OSCE performance.Conclusion: A short multimodal workshop focused on stress management and communication training did not improve OSCE performance or OSCE-related anxiety, suggesting that single-session interventions may be insufficient.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.19
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of a short multimodal workshop including stress management and communication skills training on objective structured clinical examination performance and exam-related anxiety in French medical students: a randomized controlled study

Marion Strullu, Philibert Duriez, Guillaume Beinse, Marie‐Aude Piot et al.
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Efficacy of a short multimodal workshop including stress management and communication skills training on objective structured clinical examination performance and exam-related anxiety in French medical students: a randomized controlled study

Marion Strullu, Philibert Duriez, Guillaume Beinse, Marie‐Aude Piot, Meryl Vedrenne‐Cloquet, Noémie de Cacqueray, Alain Cariou, Donia Bouzid, Damien Roux, Étienne de Montmollin, Augustin Gaudemer
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of a short multimodal workshop, including stress-management and communication-skills training, on objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) performance and exam-related anxiety among medical students identified as needing additional support.Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial including fifth-year medical students with the lowest scores on an initial mock OSCE. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention group (stress management, communication training, and OSCE simulation) or the control group. OSCE examiners were blinded to group allocation. Anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State scale (STAI-State) before the intervention (T0), after the intervention (T1; intervention group only), and before the second mock OSCE (T2). OSCE scores and anxiety levels were compared between groups, and changes in anxiety over time were analyzed among students in the intervention group.Results: A total of 109 students were included in the per-protocol analysis (49 intervention, 60 control). Global OSCE scores at T2 did not differ between groups (median [interquartile range], 13.0/20 [11.9–14.3] vs. 13.3/20 [12.0–14.6]; between-group difference, 0.08 [95% confidence interval, −0.14 to 0.29]; P=0.50). Anxiety levels were moderate, with no significant between-group difference (STAI-State score, 47 [42–50], n=8, in the intervention group vs. 44 [42–46], n=12; P=0.32). A transient increase in situational anxiety was observed immediately after training in some intervention participants. No correlation was found between anxiety and OSCE performance.Conclusion: A short multimodal workshop focused on stress management and communication training did not improve OSCE performance or OSCE-related anxiety, suggesting that single-session interventions may be insufficient.

Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health ProfessionsVol. 23
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.