The Call for Open Science in Modeling

<ns5:p> A model is a living portfolio of conceptual, formal and implemented versions of a physical description of ‘something’ - including possibly different mathematical and computational implementations in modeling software - in relation to a collection of documentations of analyses and applications of these different versions. As the culture in modeling software shifts towards Open Science, many in our science community imagine a future infrastructure designed so that anyone in science can fully participate in research and development in an open way, where significant progress in our understanding of physical phenomena and accuracy of forecasting can be realized on faster timescales, and next generation of experts can receive quality training regardless of their backgrounds. However, we must acknowledge that funders cannot fund every software execution, develop every model, or archive every output desired by the research community, and that Open Science is not a magical solution to every problem or a gold standard to be required of every effort. However, we can purposefully design a prioritization system and the necessary supporting infrastructure to better enable research, make access to relevant education more equitable, accelerate, support collaboration, and make modeling software and their outputs more FAIR <ns5:sup>1</ns5:sup> (Wilkinson et al. 2016). Accomplishing these goals promises to increase the return on investment funders, scientists, and research software engineers put into these computational models by increasing community trust in results through increased transparency, discoverability through increased interlinking, and interoperability and reusability through more standardized approaches to documentation and file formats. This paper focuses on improvements to the infrastructure in United States for computational models in natural sciences, with the understanding that several aspects of the envisioned structure will also benefit other disciplines that deal with computationally intensive modeling software and simulations, both in US and other regions of the world. </ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.183312.1
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Call for Open Science in Modeling

Jeffrey C. Carver, Gavin A. Schmidt, C.C. Erdmann, Geerten Hengeveld et al.
F1000Research
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

The Call for Open Science in Modeling

Jeffrey C. Carver, Gavin A. Schmidt, C.C. Erdmann, Geerten Hengeveld, Ronald M. Caplan, Rebecca Ringuette, Maxine Hartnett, Meng Jin, Adam Kubaryk
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p> A model is a living portfolio of conceptual, formal and implemented versions of a physical description of ‘something’ - including possibly different mathematical and computational implementations in modeling software - in relation to a collection of documentations of analyses and applications of these different versions. As the culture in modeling software shifts towards Open Science, many in our science community imagine a future infrastructure designed so that anyone in science can fully participate in research and development in an open way, where significant progress in our understanding of physical phenomena and accuracy of forecasting can be realized on faster timescales, and next generation of experts can receive quality training regardless of their backgrounds. However, we must acknowledge that funders cannot fund every software execution, develop every model, or archive every output desired by the research community, and that Open Science is not a magical solution to every problem or a gold standard to be required of every effort. However, we can purposefully design a prioritization system and the necessary supporting infrastructure to better enable research, make access to relevant education more equitable, accelerate, support collaboration, and make modeling software and their outputs more FAIR <ns5:sup>1</ns5:sup> (Wilkinson et al. 2016). Accomplishing these goals promises to increase the return on investment funders, scientists, and research software engineers put into these computational models by increasing community trust in results through increased transparency, discoverability through increased interlinking, and interoperability and reusability through more standardized approaches to documentation and file formats. This paper focuses on improvements to the infrastructure in United States for computational models in natural sciences, with the understanding that several aspects of the envisioned structure will also benefit other disciplines that deal with computationally intensive modeling software and simulations, both in US and other regions of the world. </ns5:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), University of Alabama (US), San Diego Supercomputer Center (US), Heliophysics (US), Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NL), Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (US), Lockheed Martin (United Kingdom) (GB), Predictive Science (United States) (US), Synkera Technologies (United States) (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.