Comparative evaluation of the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of twin block, monoblock, and invisalign mandibular advancement appliances

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of the Twin Block, Monoblock, and Invisalign Mandibular Advancement (Invisalign MA) appliances used for functional treatment in individuals with skeletal Class II malocclusion. The study included 45 individuals in the S–MP3cap stage of growth and development who were treated with Monoblock ( n = 15), Twin Block ( n = 15), or Invisalign MA ( n = 15) appliances. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained before functional treatment (T0) and after treatment (T1). A total of 29 measurements were used to assess changes in the dental, skeletal, and soft tissues. Across all treatment groups, significant decreases were observed in ANB°, Wits appraisal, overjet, overbite, and skeletal and soft-tissue convexity angles; similarly, significant increases were identified in SNB°, Co–Gn (mm), Pg–Na Perp, FMA°, GoGn–SN°, LFH/TFH, L1–NB°, IMPA°, and the nasolabial angle throughout the treatment period. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups regarding the changes observed in the soft tissues. The Invisalign MA group showed less increase in vertical parameters than the other groups. Maxillary incisor inclinations decreased more significantly in the Invisalign MA group. Mandibular incisor inclination changes were similar between Monoblock and Invisalign MA groups but greater in the Twin Block group. Maxillary molar eruption was comparable between Invisalign MA and Monoblock groups, while Twin Block showed a more pronounced increase. Finally, mandibular advancement angles were similar across all groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08686-9
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of twin block, monoblock, and invisalign mandibular advancement appliances

Türkan Sezen Erhamza, Ebru İLHAN KOÇAK, Zeynep Çevik, Alaattin Tekeli̇
BMC Oral Health
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Comparative evaluation of the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of twin block, monoblock, and invisalign mandibular advancement appliances

Türkan Sezen Erhamza, Ebru İLHAN KOÇAK, Zeynep Çevik, Alaattin Tekeli̇
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of the Twin Block, Monoblock, and Invisalign Mandibular Advancement (Invisalign MA) appliances used for functional treatment in individuals with skeletal Class II malocclusion. The study included 45 individuals in the S–MP3cap stage of growth and development who were treated with Monoblock ( n = 15), Twin Block ( n = 15), or Invisalign MA ( n = 15) appliances. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained before functional treatment (T0) and after treatment (T1). A total of 29 measurements were used to assess changes in the dental, skeletal, and soft tissues. Across all treatment groups, significant decreases were observed in ANB°, Wits appraisal, overjet, overbite, and skeletal and soft-tissue convexity angles; similarly, significant increases were identified in SNB°, Co–Gn (mm), Pg–Na Perp, FMA°, GoGn–SN°, LFH/TFH, L1–NB°, IMPA°, and the nasolabial angle throughout the treatment period. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups regarding the changes observed in the soft tissues. The Invisalign MA group showed less increase in vertical parameters than the other groups. Maxillary incisor inclinations decreased more significantly in the Invisalign MA group. Mandibular incisor inclination changes were similar between Monoblock and Invisalign MA groups but greater in the Twin Block group. Maxillary molar eruption was comparable between Invisalign MA and Monoblock groups, while Twin Block showed a more pronounced increase. Finally, mandibular advancement angles were similar across all groups.

BMC Oral Health
Dokuz Eylül University (TR), American Association of Orthodontists (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of twin block, monoblock, and invisalign mandibular advancement appliances — Türkan Sezen Erhamza, Ebru İLHAN KOÇAK, et al. · BMC Oral Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS