Party systems and executive accountability: The politics of investigative committees in Central and Eastern Europe

Abstract Parliaments are equipped with accountability mechanisms to uncover and sanction executive misconduct, yet the variation in their use across countries and over time remains poorly understood. This article links the frequency with which various constellations of MPs initiate ad hoc parliamentary investigative committees (ICs) to the institutionalization of party systems. It argues that the closure of the party system in the governmental arena, and particularly the degree of alternation in government, fosters the use of ICs due to the enhanced clarity of responsibility and competitive pressures. This argument is tested using a novel dataset of IC proposals in 97 cabinets across 10 countries of Central and Eastern Europe from the early 2000s to 2024. The findings indicate that under closed party systems, these accountability mechanisms are initiated more frequently both by opposition parties and a portion of coalition parties without the support of the remaining coalition partners. The article adds to the comparative understanding of parliamentary accountability as exercised by both opposition and government parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s147567652610139x
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Party systems and executive accountability: The politics of investigative committees in Central and Eastern Europe

Marko Kukec
European Journal of Political Research
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Party systems and executive accountability: The politics of investigative committees in Central and Eastern Europe

Marko Kukec
article en

Abstract

Abstract Parliaments are equipped with accountability mechanisms to uncover and sanction executive misconduct, yet the variation in their use across countries and over time remains poorly understood. This article links the frequency with which various constellations of MPs initiate ad hoc parliamentary investigative committees (ICs) to the institutionalization of party systems. It argues that the closure of the party system in the governmental arena, and particularly the degree of alternation in government, fosters the use of ICs due to the enhanced clarity of responsibility and competitive pressures. This argument is tested using a novel dataset of IC proposals in 97 cabinets across 10 countries of Central and Eastern Europe from the early 2000s to 2024. The findings indicate that under closed party systems, these accountability mechanisms are initiated more frequently both by opposition parties and a portion of coalition parties without the support of the remaining coalition partners. The article adds to the comparative understanding of parliamentary accountability as exercised by both opposition and government parties.

European Journal of Political Research
Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.