How public are they? Privately owned public spaces in Shanghai, China

Global discourses on privately owned public spaces (POPS) remain largely confined to Western contexts, while Chinese research predominantly focuses on publicly owned and managed public spaces. This research shifts the focus to POPS in Shanghai, China. It assesses the publicness of 42 POPS in Shanghai, analyzes their spatial design, facility provision, social control, and daily use. Empirical evidence shows that the socio-spatial consequences of the rise of POPS in Shanghai are dynamic and reciprocal, not monolithic. The findings of the research enrich the ongoing global discourses about POPS and provide insights for policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Research & Practice
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2026.2690504
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How public are they? Privately owned public spaces in Shanghai, China

Jie Chen, Yiming Wang
Urban Research & Practice
Urban Planning and Governance
article

How public are they? Privately owned public spaces in Shanghai, China

Jie Chen, Yiming Wang
article en

Abstract

Global discourses on privately owned public spaces (POPS) remain largely confined to Western contexts, while Chinese research predominantly focuses on publicly owned and managed public spaces. This research shifts the focus to POPS in Shanghai, China. It assesses the publicness of 42 POPS in Shanghai, analyzes their spatial design, facility provision, social control, and daily use. Empirical evidence shows that the socio-spatial consequences of the rise of POPS in Shanghai are dynamic and reciprocal, not monolithic. The findings of the research enrich the ongoing global discourses about POPS and provide insights for policymaking.

Urban Research & Practice
Tongji University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.