Forward Generation of the GW150914 Gravitational-Wave Signal from a Constrained Propagation Model

This work tests whether a source–observer propagation relation calibrated independently from Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova data can forward-generate the GW150914 gravitational-wave (GW) chirp when applied unchanged in the gravitational-wave domain. Using leading-order chirp dynamics recovered as the GR 0PN limit of the UMH formulation, together with this fixed propagation mapping, a strictly constrained forward waveform generator produces a waveform consistent with the observed inspiral–merger–ringdown morphology of GW150914, including chirp frequency evolution, merger timing, and a ringdown phase modeled as intrinsic relaxation dynamics. The generated signal is projected onto the LIGO detectors using standard antenna response functions and geometric time delays. A separate comparison with the publicly available strain data uses a single global time/polarity registration anchor and introduces no per-detector fitting, phase adjustment, frequency remapping, empirical amplitude fitting, waveform reparameterization, or higher-order tuning. This is not a template-fitting analysis, nor is it a competing replacement for General Relativity. In the present framing, the GR-order chirp law is recovered as the effective large-scale limit, while the specific objective of this paper is narrower: to test whether a propagation law fixed independently in cosmology remains self-consistent when applied to gravitational-wave observations. The propagation parameter governing the source–observer mapping is determined entirely from the Pantheon+ supernova dataset and is not recalibrated for the gravitational-wave signal, allowing GW150914 to serve as an independent cross-domain test. The forward model reproduces key features of the observed GW150914 morphology without event-specific waveform tuning, yielding network signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) greater than or approximately equal to 22 at the strongest detector-network consistency point of the coarse event-configuration sweep, under standard whitening and fixed-registration diagnostics. These results demonstrate that a gravitational-wave chirp can be forward-generated from an independently calibrated propagation law while preserving consistency across frequency evolution, phase accumulation, amplitude normalization, and ringdown relaxation. Repository Notes: This version supersedes earlier releases and incorporates expanded methodological explanations, additional diagnostic analyses, conceptual diagrams, and revised scientific communication developed during peer review. The underlying UMH propagation formulation and forward-generation methodology remain unchanged; revisions primarily improve explanatory framing, validation transparency, and cross-domain context between the independent supernova calibration and gravitational-wave application.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20751751
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Forward Generation of the GW150914 Gravitational-Wave Signal from a Constrained Propagation Model

Andrew Dodge
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
preprint

Forward Generation of the GW150914 Gravitational-Wave Signal from a Constrained Propagation Model

Andrew Dodge
preprint en

Abstract

This work tests whether a source–observer propagation relation calibrated independently from Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova data can forward-generate the GW150914 gravitational-wave (GW) chirp when applied unchanged in the gravitational-wave domain. Using leading-order chirp dynamics recovered as the GR 0PN limit of the UMH formulation, together with this fixed propagation mapping, a strictly constrained forward waveform generator produces a waveform consistent with the observed inspiral–merger–ringdown morphology of GW150914, including chirp frequency evolution, merger timing, and a ringdown phase modeled as intrinsic relaxation dynamics. The generated signal is projected onto the LIGO detectors using standard antenna response functions and geometric time delays. A separate comparison with the publicly available strain data uses a single global time/polarity registration anchor and introduces no per-detector fitting, phase adjustment, frequency remapping, empirical amplitude fitting, waveform reparameterization, or higher-order tuning. This is not a template-fitting analysis, nor is it a competing replacement for General Relativity. In the present framing, the GR-order chirp law is recovered as the effective large-scale limit, while the specific objective of this paper is narrower: to test whether a propagation law fixed independently in cosmology remains self-consistent when applied to gravitational-wave observations. The propagation parameter governing the source–observer mapping is determined entirely from the Pantheon+ supernova dataset and is not recalibrated for the gravitational-wave signal, allowing GW150914 to serve as an independent cross-domain test. The forward model reproduces key features of the observed GW150914 morphology without event-specific waveform tuning, yielding network signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) greater than or approximately equal to 22 at the strongest detector-network consistency point of the coarse event-configuration sweep, under standard whitening and fixed-registration diagnostics. These results demonstrate that a gravitational-wave chirp can be forward-generated from an independently calibrated propagation law while preserving consistency across frequency evolution, phase accumulation, amplitude normalization, and ringdown relaxation. Repository Notes: This version supersedes earlier releases and incorporates expanded methodological explanations, additional diagnostic analyses, conceptual diagrams, and revised scientific communication developed during peer review. The underlying UMH propagation formulation and forward-generation methodology remain unchanged; revisions primarily improve explanatory framing, validation transparency, and cross-domain context between the independent supernova calibration and gravitational-wave application.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.