Optimization of Zoned Excavation and Servo Strut Systems for Deep Excavation Groups Adjacent to Historic Buildings in Soft Soil

Deep excavation groups in soft soil can endanger adjacent historic buildings. This paper presents a 3D finite element analysis of a project in Ningbo, employing the HSS constitutive model. Three excavation schemes were compared. The small-zone staged excavation from near to far proved optimal: relative to the conventional large-block scheme, it reduced maximum wall displacement on the heritage-building side by 37.0% and building tilt by 54.0%; servo struts were then introduced in the critical sub-excavation and optimized via response surface methodology. A layered control hierarchy was revealed—wall bulging is governed by the third and fourth struts (F3 ≈ F4 > F2), and mean settlement by the third strut (F3 > F2 ≈ F4). Building tilt control relies on synergistic action of all three struts (F3 > F2 > F4), with significant antagonistic interactions among struts at high force levels. The optimal combination (F2 = 1200 kN, F3 = 1800 kN, F4 = 1550 kN) limits maximum tilt to 0.380‰, well below the 1.0‰ code limit, and remains robust under various weighting scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122432
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Zoned Excavation and Servo Strut Systems for Deep Excavation Groups Adjacent to Historic Buildings in Soft Soil

P Wang, Honggui Di, 旭 後藤, Chunxiao Chen et al.
Buildings
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Optimization of Zoned Excavation and Servo Strut Systems for Deep Excavation Groups Adjacent to Historic Buildings in Soft Soil

P Wang, Honggui Di, 旭 後藤, Chunxiao Chen, Shixin Guo
article en

Abstract

Deep excavation groups in soft soil can endanger adjacent historic buildings. This paper presents a 3D finite element analysis of a project in Ningbo, employing the HSS constitutive model. Three excavation schemes were compared. The small-zone staged excavation from near to far proved optimal: relative to the conventional large-block scheme, it reduced maximum wall displacement on the heritage-building side by 37.0% and building tilt by 54.0%; servo struts were then introduced in the critical sub-excavation and optimized via response surface methodology. A layered control hierarchy was revealed—wall bulging is governed by the third and fourth struts (F3 ≈ F4 > F2), and mean settlement by the third strut (F3 > F2 ≈ F4). Building tilt control relies on synergistic action of all three struts (F3 > F2 > F4), with significant antagonistic interactions among struts at high force levels. The optimal combination (F2 = 1200 kN, F3 = 1800 kN, F4 = 1550 kN) limits maximum tilt to 0.380‰, well below the 1.0‰ code limit, and remains robust under various weighting scenarios.

BuildingsVol. 16(12)
Tongji University (CN), University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), Shanghai Construction Group (China) (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.