A critical analysis of ethical leadership in the organization

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the construct of two-component ethical leadership style by analyzing and differentiating the goals of the two components of ethical leadership: the moral person and the moral manager. Design/methodology/approach Taking the analytical approach, this paper problematizes the two-component ethical leadership style by developing the distinctions in the goals of moral person and moral manager and by doing so, it points to the divergent outcomes ethical leadership can lead to in the organization. Findings Conceptual analysis leads to the argument that under certain conditions, ethical leaders can negatively affect trust in the relationship of leader and subordinates, employee empathy development, and intrinsic motivation to act morally by creating feelings of moral inadequacy, focus on stated norms, and crowding out of intrinsic motivation, respectively. Originality/value This work contributes to the critical analysis of the constructs used commonly in social and business ethics research, and through highlighting the schism in the two-component ethical leadership construct, this paper offers remedies to improve the practice of ethical leadership which contributes to the leadership development, business ethics, and leadership ethics in the organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-02-2026-0082
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critical analysis of ethical leadership in the organization

Shazia Khan
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Ethics in Business and Education
article

A critical analysis of ethical leadership in the organization

Shazia Khan
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the construct of two-component ethical leadership style by analyzing and differentiating the goals of the two components of ethical leadership: the moral person and the moral manager. Design/methodology/approach Taking the analytical approach, this paper problematizes the two-component ethical leadership style by developing the distinctions in the goals of moral person and moral manager and by doing so, it points to the divergent outcomes ethical leadership can lead to in the organization. Findings Conceptual analysis leads to the argument that under certain conditions, ethical leaders can negatively affect trust in the relationship of leader and subordinates, employee empathy development, and intrinsic motivation to act morally by creating feelings of moral inadequacy, focus on stated norms, and crowding out of intrinsic motivation, respectively. Originality/value This work contributes to the critical analysis of the constructs used commonly in social and business ethics research, and through highlighting the schism in the two-component ethical leadership construct, this paper offers remedies to improve the practice of ethical leadership which contributes to the leadership development, business ethics, and leadership ethics in the organization.

International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Bahria University (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.