Subperiosteal tunnel assisted graft (STAG) technique: Report of two cases

Abstract Background This case report describes the clinical application of the subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique, a novel approach for peri‐implant phenotype modification and keratinized tissue augmentation. Although free gingival grafts remain the gold standard for increasing keratinized tissue width, their effectiveness may be compromised by postoperative graft shrinkage or partial graft loss, often resulting from limited vascular supply, inadequate adaptation to the recipient bed, and insufficient graft stability—particularly in posterior regions or sites with shallow vestibules where surgical access and tension control are more challenging. Methods The STAG technique was developed to overcome these limitations through the creation of a subperiosteal tunnel that enables bilateral graft insertion and stabilization using lasso sutures at both ends of the graft. This approach facilitates simultaneous augmentation of keratinized tissue, vestibular depth, and soft tissue thickness while minimizing graft mobility and enhancing adaptation to the recipient site. Results The presented cases demonstrated successful augmentation of keratinized mucosa and vestibular depth, along with increased peri‐implant mucosal thickness and stable soft tissue integration at the treated sites. Conclusion The STAG technique may provide a predictable approach for the management of complex peri‐implant mucogingival deficiencies and peri‐implant phenotype enhancement. Key points Subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique offers a predictable alternative to conventional free gingival grafts for peri‐implant mucosal augmentation. By maintaining close adaptation between the donor graft and recipient bed, the STAG approach enhances vascular integration and reduces the risk of graft contraction or failure. This method enables peri‐implant mucosa phenotype modification therapy, including mucosal thickness gain, keratinized mucosa gain, vestibular depth, and frenum pull elimination in a single procedure, optimizing both function and patient comfort. Plain language summary The subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique provides a predictable and effective alternative to conventional free gingival graft by enabling superior graft adaptation between the donor tissue and recipient bed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.70079
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subperiosteal tunnel assisted graft (STAG) technique: Report of two cases

Seiko Min
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Subperiosteal tunnel assisted graft (STAG) technique: Report of two cases

Seiko Min
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background This case report describes the clinical application of the subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique, a novel approach for peri‐implant phenotype modification and keratinized tissue augmentation. Although free gingival grafts remain the gold standard for increasing keratinized tissue width, their effectiveness may be compromised by postoperative graft shrinkage or partial graft loss, often resulting from limited vascular supply, inadequate adaptation to the recipient bed, and insufficient graft stability—particularly in posterior regions or sites with shallow vestibules where surgical access and tension control are more challenging. Methods The STAG technique was developed to overcome these limitations through the creation of a subperiosteal tunnel that enables bilateral graft insertion and stabilization using lasso sutures at both ends of the graft. This approach facilitates simultaneous augmentation of keratinized tissue, vestibular depth, and soft tissue thickness while minimizing graft mobility and enhancing adaptation to the recipient site. Results The presented cases demonstrated successful augmentation of keratinized mucosa and vestibular depth, along with increased peri‐implant mucosal thickness and stable soft tissue integration at the treated sites. Conclusion The STAG technique may provide a predictable approach for the management of complex peri‐implant mucogingival deficiencies and peri‐implant phenotype enhancement. Key points Subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique offers a predictable alternative to conventional free gingival grafts for peri‐implant mucosal augmentation. By maintaining close adaptation between the donor graft and recipient bed, the STAG approach enhances vascular integration and reduces the risk of graft contraction or failure. This method enables peri‐implant mucosa phenotype modification therapy, including mucosal thickness gain, keratinized mucosa gain, vestibular depth, and frenum pull elimination in a single procedure, optimizing both function and patient comfort. Plain language summary The subperiosteal tunnel‐assisted graft (STAG) technique provides a predictable and effective alternative to conventional free gingival graft by enabling superior graft adaptation between the donor tissue and recipient bed.

Clinical Advances in Periodontics
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.