The enigmatic historical record of the leaf beetle <i>Acentroptera norrisii</i> in Spain: failed biological introduction or curatorial artefact?

Background Natural History Collections (NHC) often contain exceptional specimens documenting unusual historical events, and these records can be valuable for detecting overlooked biological introductions. Here, we examine a striking case: a Neotropical leaf beetle, Acentroptera norrisii , labelled as collected in central Spain in 1998 by Dr J. Modolell. Given the species’ native distribution in the Neotropics, this record raises the question of whether it represents a failed historical introduction or a curatorial artefact. Methods We reconstructed the circumstances of the collection event using the collector’s personal archives. We conducted scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to document microscopic particles on the specimen’s cuticle. We also analysed the content of the original specimen box to evaluate the likelihood of pollen cross-contamination, considering the geographical origin and family-level identity of all co-stored specimens. Results Archival evidence confirms the collector’s presence at the labelled locality and date. SEM revealed several pollen grains consistent with plant taxa occurring at the collection site. However, the original box also contained numerous Spanish specimens belonging to beetle families with known anthophilous habits, meaning that cross-contamination during storage cannot be fully excluded. As a result, the palynological evidence remains inconclusive. Conclusions Together, the available evidence makes a failed historical introduction a plausible scenario, yet the inconclusive particle analysis prevents any confident confirmation. This case highlights both the potential and the limitations of NHC-derived data in invasion biology: while museum collections can preserve traces of otherwise “invisible” introductions, interpreting isolated and context-poor specimens remains inherently uncertain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21213
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The enigmatic historical record of the leaf beetle Acentroptera norrisii in Spain: failed biological introduction or curatorial artefact?

Inés Modolell, Mercedes París, Peter Lawrence, José Antonio López-Sáez et al.
PeerJ
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

The enigmatic historical record of the leaf beetle Acentroptera norrisii in Spain: failed biological introduction or curatorial artefact?

Inés Modolell, Mercedes París, Peter Lawrence, José Antonio López-Sáez, Adrián Sánchez Albert
article en

Abstract

Background Natural History Collections (NHC) often contain exceptional specimens documenting unusual historical events, and these records can be valuable for detecting overlooked biological introductions. Here, we examine a striking case: a Neotropical leaf beetle, Acentroptera norrisii , labelled as collected in central Spain in 1998 by Dr J. Modolell. Given the species’ native distribution in the Neotropics, this record raises the question of whether it represents a failed historical introduction or a curatorial artefact. Methods We reconstructed the circumstances of the collection event using the collector’s personal archives. We conducted scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to document microscopic particles on the specimen’s cuticle. We also analysed the content of the original specimen box to evaluate the likelihood of pollen cross-contamination, considering the geographical origin and family-level identity of all co-stored specimens. Results Archival evidence confirms the collector’s presence at the labelled locality and date. SEM revealed several pollen grains consistent with plant taxa occurring at the collection site. However, the original box also contained numerous Spanish specimens belonging to beetle families with known anthophilous habits, meaning that cross-contamination during storage cannot be fully excluded. As a result, the palynological evidence remains inconclusive. Conclusions Together, the available evidence makes a failed historical introduction a plausible scenario, yet the inconclusive particle analysis prevents any confident confirmation. This case highlights both the potential and the limitations of NHC-derived data in invasion biology: while museum collections can preserve traces of otherwise “invisible” introductions, interpreting isolated and context-poor specimens remains inherently uncertain.

PeerJVol. 14
University of Cambridge (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (ES), Institute of History (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.