Prediction and Interpretation of the Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bioreactors Using a No-Code Platform for Autonomous Machine Learning Model Selection

The volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) governs the design, operation, and scale-up of aerobic bioprocesses, yet its dependence on reactor geometry, impeller design, operating conditions, and fluid properties limits prediction by empirical correlations. Machine learning (ML) improves accuracy but faces two barriers in bioprocess practice: selecting the best model among many candidates requires expertise, and small, highly multicollinear data make models chosen based on test error alone prone to overfitting. Using a browser-based, no-code platform, we trained 14 regression algorithms under an identical pipeline on a published kLa dataset, and introduced a composite objective, the generalization-penalized error (GPE), which is the test RMSE plus the absolute train–test RMSE gap. Minimizing GPE rather than test RMSE expanded the top statistically equivalent group to include not only boosting ensembles but also simpler, interpretable models, indicating that black-box models hold no clear advantage once train–test consistency is assessed. Sensitivity analysis showed that tree models produce discontinuous responses, whereas algebraic learning via elastic net (ALVEN) yields smooth surfaces. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and an ontology graph, interpreted by a retrieval-augmented language-model agent, identified rotational speed and gas flow rate as dominant, reproducing the established mass transfer mechanism. The framework offers a reproducible, interpretable, expertise-light route to bioprocess model selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121982
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction and Interpretation of the Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bioreactors Using a No-Code Platform for Autonomous Machine Learning Model Selection

Sang‐Min Paik, Moo Sun Hong, Hoyeon Lee, Jun-Woo Kim et al.
Processes
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Prediction and Interpretation of the Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bioreactors Using a No-Code Platform for Autonomous Machine Learning Model Selection

Sang‐Min Paik, Moo Sun Hong, Hoyeon Lee, Jun-Woo Kim, Yonghee Shin, Jin Ho Lee, Hwa Sung Shin, Sangmin Park, Jongsun Won
article en

Abstract

The volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) governs the design, operation, and scale-up of aerobic bioprocesses, yet its dependence on reactor geometry, impeller design, operating conditions, and fluid properties limits prediction by empirical correlations. Machine learning (ML) improves accuracy but faces two barriers in bioprocess practice: selecting the best model among many candidates requires expertise, and small, highly multicollinear data make models chosen based on test error alone prone to overfitting. Using a browser-based, no-code platform, we trained 14 regression algorithms under an identical pipeline on a published kLa dataset, and introduced a composite objective, the generalization-penalized error (GPE), which is the test RMSE plus the absolute train–test RMSE gap. Minimizing GPE rather than test RMSE expanded the top statistically equivalent group to include not only boosting ensembles but also simpler, interpretable models, indicating that black-box models hold no clear advantage once train–test consistency is assessed. Sensitivity analysis showed that tree models produce discontinuous responses, whereas algebraic learning via elastic net (ALVEN) yields smooth surfaces. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and an ontology graph, interpreted by a retrieval-augmented language-model agent, identified rotational speed and gas flow rate as dominant, reproducing the established mass transfer mechanism. The framework offers a reproducible, interpretable, expertise-light route to bioprocess model selection.

ProcessesVol. 14(12)
CJ CheilJedang (South Korea) (KR), Seoul National University (KR), Inha University (KR), Samsung (South Korea) (KR), Daejeon Technopark (KR), Anyang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.