Diet-induced thermogenesis does not differ after ingestion of an isoenergetic meal, whereas early-phase thermogenesis differed between athletes and non-athletes

PURPOSE: Habitual exercise is considered to be one of the factors that influence diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT). Still, whether DIT differs between athletes and non-athletes remains unclear due to the effects of test meal's volume and nutritional composition. This study aimed to reveal whether the DIT of athletes differs from that of non-athletes after ingesting an isoenergetic meal with a typical nutritional composition in Japan. METHODS: Twenty-six highly trained male athletes and 11 male non-athletes participated in this study. Measurements for determining DIT consisted of measurements of resting energy expenditure (REE) and postprandial energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry using the Douglas bag technique. After measuring REE, participants ingested a liquid test meal (600 kcal, 15% energy from protein, 25% energy from fat, and 60% energy from carbohydrates). Postprandial energy expenditure was measured up to 180 min. Thermogenesis at each postprandial time point was calculated by subtracting REE from postprandial energy expenditure. DIT over the 200-min period was determined from the area under the curve. RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in DIT and the percentage of DIT to test meal energy over the 200-min period. The thermogenesis at 20, 40, and 60 min after ingestion of the test meal were 27.5%, 25.8%, and 27.0% greater in athletes than in non-athletes, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in DIT between athletes and non-athletes, but thermogenesis was significantly higher in athletes during the first 60 min of the DIT measurement, indicating differences in digestion, absorption, or storage of nutrients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06305-7
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diet-induced thermogenesis does not differ after ingestion of an isoenergetic meal, whereas early-phase thermogenesis differed between athletes and non-athletes

Nozomi Miura, Naoyuki Hayashi, Mika Goshozono, Suguru Torii et al.
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Diet-induced thermogenesis does not differ after ingestion of an isoenergetic meal, whereas early-phase thermogenesis differed between athletes and non-athletes

Nozomi Miura, Naoyuki Hayashi, Mika Goshozono, Suguru Torii, Tatsuya Ishizu, Motoko Taguchi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Habitual exercise is considered to be one of the factors that influence diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT). Still, whether DIT differs between athletes and non-athletes remains unclear due to the effects of test meal's volume and nutritional composition. This study aimed to reveal whether the DIT of athletes differs from that of non-athletes after ingesting an isoenergetic meal with a typical nutritional composition in Japan. METHODS: Twenty-six highly trained male athletes and 11 male non-athletes participated in this study. Measurements for determining DIT consisted of measurements of resting energy expenditure (REE) and postprandial energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry using the Douglas bag technique. After measuring REE, participants ingested a liquid test meal (600 kcal, 15% energy from protein, 25% energy from fat, and 60% energy from carbohydrates). Postprandial energy expenditure was measured up to 180 min. Thermogenesis at each postprandial time point was calculated by subtracting REE from postprandial energy expenditure. DIT over the 200-min period was determined from the area under the curve. RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in DIT and the percentage of DIT to test meal energy over the 200-min period. The thermogenesis at 20, 40, and 60 min after ingestion of the test meal were 27.5%, 25.8%, and 27.0% greater in athletes than in non-athletes, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in DIT between athletes and non-athletes, but thermogenesis was significantly higher in athletes during the first 60 min of the DIT measurement, indicating differences in digestion, absorption, or storage of nutrients.

European Journal of Applied Physiology
Waseda University (JP)
Waseda University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.