Metacognitive beliefs and sexual dissatisfaction in women: an explorative study in a non-clinical population

Background Sexual dissatisfaction is common among women and is frequently associated with cognitive processes that interfere with sexual experience. Metacognitive models highlight negative beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of thoughts as key mechanisms sustaining worry, yet their role in sexual dissatisfaction in non-clinical women remains underexplored.Objective This study examined associations between worry, metacognitive beliefs, and sexual dissatisfaction, testing whether negative metacognitive beliefs mediate the relationship between worry and sexual dissatisfaction.Methods The sample included 304 sexually active Italian-speaking women (M age = 31.96, SD = 9.01) who completed the Sexual Dissatisfaction subscale of the BISF-W, the MCQ-30, and the PSWQ. Correlation analyses, hierarchical regressions, and mediation analyses were conducted.Results Sexual dissatisfaction was positively associated with worry and metacognitive beliefs. Worry predicted sexual dissatisfaction, but this association became non-significant when negative metacognitive beliefs were included. A significant indirect effect of worry on sexual dissatisfaction through negative metacognitive beliefs emerged, while other metacognitive domains did not show consistent mediation effects.Conclusions Sexual dissatisfaction in non-clinical women appears primarily linked to negative metacognitive beliefs rather than worry itself, suggesting these beliefs as relevant targets for intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual & Relationship Therapy
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2026.2687537
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metacognitive beliefs and sexual dissatisfaction in women: an explorative study in a non-clinical population

Gabriele Caselli, Carlotta Olivari, Marco Di Cugno
Sexual & Relationship Therapy
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Metacognitive beliefs and sexual dissatisfaction in women: an explorative study in a non-clinical population

Gabriele Caselli, Carlotta Olivari, Marco Di Cugno
article en

Abstract

Background Sexual dissatisfaction is common among women and is frequently associated with cognitive processes that interfere with sexual experience. Metacognitive models highlight negative beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of thoughts as key mechanisms sustaining worry, yet their role in sexual dissatisfaction in non-clinical women remains underexplored.Objective This study examined associations between worry, metacognitive beliefs, and sexual dissatisfaction, testing whether negative metacognitive beliefs mediate the relationship between worry and sexual dissatisfaction.Methods The sample included 304 sexually active Italian-speaking women (M age = 31.96, SD = 9.01) who completed the Sexual Dissatisfaction subscale of the BISF-W, the MCQ-30, and the PSWQ. Correlation analyses, hierarchical regressions, and mediation analyses were conducted.Results Sexual dissatisfaction was positively associated with worry and metacognitive beliefs. Worry predicted sexual dissatisfaction, but this association became non-significant when negative metacognitive beliefs were included. A significant indirect effect of worry on sexual dissatisfaction through negative metacognitive beliefs emerged, while other metacognitive domains did not show consistent mediation effects.Conclusions Sexual dissatisfaction in non-clinical women appears primarily linked to negative metacognitive beliefs rather than worry itself, suggesting these beliefs as relevant targets for intervention.

Sexual & Relationship Therapy
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT), London South Bank University (GB), Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität - Standort Mailand (IT), Cognitive Research (United States) (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.