Clinical and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotype of Probable Viral versus Probable Immune-mediated Acute Myocarditis

BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial biopsy can distinguish between immune-mediated and viral myocarditis, but is rarely performed in routine practice. It is unclear whether clinically defined probable viral myocarditis (pVM) and probable immune-mediated myocarditis (pIM) differ in presentation, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) phenotype, and prognosis. METHODS: Patients referred for CMR due to possible myocarditis were enrolled at two tertiary centers. pVM was defined as myocarditis within 14 days of a documented infectious disease. pIM was defined as acute myocarditis in patients with a known systemic autoimmune disease. Those not meeting either definition were excluded. Clinical characteristics, CMR features and clinical outcomes using a composite endpoint of first heart failure hospitalization, recurrent myocarditis, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or all-cause death were compared. RESULTS: Among 1122 patients referred for CMR for clinically suspected myocarditis, 379 met criteria for pVM and 116 for pIM. Compared with pIM, patients with pVM were younger (36.0 vs. 55.0 years, p<0.001) and more frequently presented with acute chest-pain and ST-segment elevation (17.9 vs. 7.8%, p=0.012). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (83.6 vs. 70.2%, p=0.006) and basal septal LGE involvement (31.5 vs. 18.7%, p=0.006) were more common in pIM. pIM was associated with worse outcomes at median 3.3 years follow-up and independently predicted the composite endpoint (HRadj=1.89, 95%CI:1.03-3.48; p=0.041). In pIM, age was the only predictor of adverse events, while in pVM multiple clinical and CMR features were prognostically relevant. CONCLUSION: pVM and pIM were associated with distinct clinical and CMR phenotypes. While outcomes in pVM appeared closely linked to myocardial injury patterns, pIM was associated with poorer outcomes, largely independent of imaging findings, suggesting a more heterogeneous inflammatory cardiomyopathy driven by the underlying systemic disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejhf/xuag202
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotype of Probable Viral versus Probable Immune-mediated Acute Myocarditis

Benedikt Bernhard, Isaac Shiri, Isabela Reis Marques, E Pakhomova Elena et al.
European Journal of Heart Failure
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
article

Clinical and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Phenotype of Probable Viral versus Probable Immune-mediated Acute Myocarditis

Benedikt Bernhard, Isaac Shiri, Isabela Reis Marques, E Pakhomova Elena, Alan A. Peters, R Christoph, Adam Bakula, Christoph Gräni, Chrysoula Garefa, Giulin Tanner, Wahl Andreas, R Y Kwong, Moritz Hundertmark, Kiril Stoyanov, Egli Fabian
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial biopsy can distinguish between immune-mediated and viral myocarditis, but is rarely performed in routine practice. It is unclear whether clinically defined probable viral myocarditis (pVM) and probable immune-mediated myocarditis (pIM) differ in presentation, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) phenotype, and prognosis. METHODS: Patients referred for CMR due to possible myocarditis were enrolled at two tertiary centers. pVM was defined as myocarditis within 14 days of a documented infectious disease. pIM was defined as acute myocarditis in patients with a known systemic autoimmune disease. Those not meeting either definition were excluded. Clinical characteristics, CMR features and clinical outcomes using a composite endpoint of first heart failure hospitalization, recurrent myocarditis, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or all-cause death were compared. RESULTS: Among 1122 patients referred for CMR for clinically suspected myocarditis, 379 met criteria for pVM and 116 for pIM. Compared with pIM, patients with pVM were younger (36.0 vs. 55.0 years, p<0.001) and more frequently presented with acute chest-pain and ST-segment elevation (17.9 vs. 7.8%, p=0.012). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (83.6 vs. 70.2%, p=0.006) and basal septal LGE involvement (31.5 vs. 18.7%, p=0.006) were more common in pIM. pIM was associated with worse outcomes at median 3.3 years follow-up and independently predicted the composite endpoint (HRadj=1.89, 95%CI:1.03-3.48; p=0.041). In pIM, age was the only predictor of adverse events, while in pVM multiple clinical and CMR features were prognostically relevant. CONCLUSION: pVM and pIM were associated with distinct clinical and CMR phenotypes. While outcomes in pVM appeared closely linked to myocardial injury patterns, pIM was associated with poorer outcomes, largely independent of imaging findings, suggesting a more heterogeneous inflammatory cardiomyopathy driven by the underlying systemic disease.

European Journal of Heart Failure
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (DE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Viral Infections and Immunology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.