Inequity aversion in multi-task agency problems

This paper studies how inequity aversion affects the optimal incentive contract in a multi-task principal–agent model with a non-congruent performance measure. We assume that the agent is inequity averse relative to the principal. The agent is envious if he/she expects to get less than the principal and feels guilty, if he/she expects to be paid more. The agent performs two equally productive tasks, but the contractible performance measure is more sensitive to one task than the other, generating a congruity problem. We find that it is never optimal to offer a contract, which leaves the agent envious. Rather, in equilibrium the principal offers either an equal-pay contract or a contract that leaves the agent feeling guilty. For a lower range of the agent’s reservation utility, the only feasible contract is an equal-pay contract. It requires a distortion of incentives and thus results in agency costs from avoiding inequity in addition to agency costs from incongruity. It follows that the principal would prefer to hire a purely self-interested agent as opposed to an inequity averse one. For an upper range of reservation utilities, a contract that leaves the agent feeling guilty is feasible and preferred to an equal-pay contract. This contract results in costs from inequity, but also reduces costs from incongruity. If the first effect dominates the second, hiring an inequity averse agent again turns out to be detrimental. However, we identify scenarios in which the second effect dominates and hiring an inequity averse agent benefits the principal. Acknowledging that an agent might derive extra utility from being paid more than the principal, rather than to feel guilty, we extend our analysis to capture a status-seeking agent. We find that an agent with such preferences requires less pay but his/her effort choice amplifies the congruity problem. Depending on which of the two effects dominates, the principal either prefers to hire a self-interested or a status-seeking agent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24352/ub.ovgu-2026-066
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Inequity aversion in multi-task agency problems

Barbara Schöndube‐Pirchegger, Sergei Snegirev
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Game Theory and Voting Systems
preprint

Inequity aversion in multi-task agency problems

Barbara Schöndube‐Pirchegger, Sergei Snegirev
preprint en

Abstract

This paper studies how inequity aversion affects the optimal incentive contract in a multi-task principal–agent model with a non-congruent performance measure. We assume that the agent is inequity averse relative to the principal. The agent is envious if he/she expects to get less than the principal and feels guilty, if he/she expects to be paid more. The agent performs two equally productive tasks, but the contractible performance measure is more sensitive to one task than the other, generating a congruity problem. We find that it is never optimal to offer a contract, which leaves the agent envious. Rather, in equilibrium the principal offers either an equal-pay contract or a contract that leaves the agent feeling guilty. For a lower range of the agent’s reservation utility, the only feasible contract is an equal-pay contract. It requires a distortion of incentives and thus results in agency costs from avoiding inequity in addition to agency costs from incongruity. It follows that the principal would prefer to hire a purely self-interested agent as opposed to an inequity averse one. For an upper range of reservation utilities, a contract that leaves the agent feeling guilty is feasible and preferred to an equal-pay contract. This contract results in costs from inequity, but also reduces costs from incongruity. If the first effect dominates the second, hiring an inequity averse agent again turns out to be detrimental. However, we identify scenarios in which the second effect dominates and hiring an inequity averse agent benefits the principal. Acknowledging that an agent might derive extra utility from being paid more than the principal, rather than to feel guilty, we extend our analysis to capture a status-seeking agent. We find that an agent with such preferences requires less pay but his/her effort choice amplifies the congruity problem. Depending on which of the two effects dominates, the principal either prefers to hire a self-interested or a status-seeking agent.

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.