Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks

At the archeological site of Pompeii, the deterioration of exposed structures is frequently associated with the combined action of microbial colonization and soluble salts, both recognized as major agents of decay affecting ancient surfaces. Although biocides are commonly applied during cleaning procedures to reduce microbial biomass, their incorporation into restoration-oriented formulations for the protection of porous stone substrates requires careful assessment of efficacy, microbiological risks, and sustainability. This study evaluated the performance of 2,4,5,6-tetrachloroisophthalonitrile (chlorothalonil) and iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC) as candidate active ingredients for conservation applications in activated new mortars. Yellow tuff, gray tuff, and brick samples collected from different sectors of Pompeii were investigated through culture-based analyses, ATP quantification, and metabolic profiling. Biocidal treatments were subsequently tested under laboratory conditions. The investigated substrates exhibited variable microbial counts and metabolic activity, generally reflecting different degrees of deterioration. Chlorothalonil showed negligible inhibitory effects, whereas IPBC reduced fungal growth in a dose-dependent manner. However, the highest IPBC concentration induced a red chromatic alteration associated with the selection of a bacterial strain preliminarily identified as Micrococcus roseus. Phenotype microarray analyses revealed broad chemical tolerance. Overall, biocidal treatments may alter microbial communities, favor tolerant microorganisms, and produce undesirable aesthetic effects. Finally, the study also assessed the environmental impact associated with laboratory and field activities, highlighting potential mitigation strategies to support more sustainable conservation research practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9060242
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks

Claudio Caprari, Carlo Viti, P. Bosch, Gabriella Saviano et al.
Heritage
Building materials and conservation
article

Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks

Claudio Caprari, Carlo Viti, P. Bosch, Gabriella Saviano, Laura Rampazzi, Elisabetta Zanardini, Francesca Decorosi, Giancarlo Ranalli
article en

Abstract

At the archeological site of Pompeii, the deterioration of exposed structures is frequently associated with the combined action of microbial colonization and soluble salts, both recognized as major agents of decay affecting ancient surfaces. Although biocides are commonly applied during cleaning procedures to reduce microbial biomass, their incorporation into restoration-oriented formulations for the protection of porous stone substrates requires careful assessment of efficacy, microbiological risks, and sustainability. This study evaluated the performance of 2,4,5,6-tetrachloroisophthalonitrile (chlorothalonil) and iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC) as candidate active ingredients for conservation applications in activated new mortars. Yellow tuff, gray tuff, and brick samples collected from different sectors of Pompeii were investigated through culture-based analyses, ATP quantification, and metabolic profiling. Biocidal treatments were subsequently tested under laboratory conditions. The investigated substrates exhibited variable microbial counts and metabolic activity, generally reflecting different degrees of deterioration. Chlorothalonil showed negligible inhibitory effects, whereas IPBC reduced fungal growth in a dose-dependent manner. However, the highest IPBC concentration induced a red chromatic alteration associated with the selection of a bacterial strain preliminarily identified as Micrococcus roseus. Phenotype microarray analyses revealed broad chemical tolerance. Overall, biocidal treatments may alter microbial communities, favor tolerant microorganisms, and produce undesirable aesthetic effects. Finally, the study also assessed the environmental impact associated with laboratory and field activities, highlighting potential mitigation strategies to support more sustainable conservation research practices.

HeritageVol. 9(6)
University of Insubria (IT), University of Molise (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Acceleratori e Superconduttività Applicata (IT), University of Florence (IT), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Building materials and conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.