Ankle exoskeleton assistance increases task-relevant variability without altering center of mass control during walking

Background Ankle exoskeletons alter joint kinematics during walking, yet their effects on whole-body coordination remain unclear. This study investigated how ankle exoskeleton assistance influences the structure of motor variability and center-of-mass movement during steady-state walking. Methods Twenty healthy adults walked on a treadmill at 1.1 m/s without the exoskeleton (noExo) and with active exoskeleton assistance (Exo). Whole-body kinematics were recorded. Variability was analyzed using the Uncontrolled Manifold (UCM) approach. Joint angle variability was decomposed into components that do not affect center-of-mass position (UCM || ) and components that do (UCM ⊥ ). Their ratio (UCM ratio ), reflecting the synergy stabilizing the center-of-mass, was calculated. Center-of-mass position was analyzed separately in three dimensions. Time-continuous differences across the gait cycle were evaluated using statistical parametric mapping. Results UCM || and UCM ratio showed no significant differences between conditions. UCM ⊥ was higher with exoskeleton assistance over large portions of the gait cycle (0–80%, p = 0.001; 91–100%, p = 0.022). Center-of-mass movement in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions did not differ between conditions, while small differences were observed in the vertical direction (higher in Exo at 23–31% and 75–84%, p = 0.037; lower at 48–54%, p = 0.042). Conclusion Ankle exoskeleton assistance increased joint-level variability affecting center-of-mass movement, but overall center-of-mass control was preserved, with only small changes in vertical center-of-mass displacement. Healthy adults maintained whole-body coordination despite altered mechanical conditions introduced by the exoskeleton. These findings are relevant for clinical exoskeleton use, where assistive devices should support walking without compromising center-of-mass control and balance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gait & Posture
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110263
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ankle exoskeleton assistance increases task-relevant variability without altering center of mass control during walking

Charlotte Marquardt, Thorsten Stein, Miha Dežman, Melina Beyerlein et al.
Gait & Posture
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Ankle exoskeleton assistance increases task-relevant variability without altering center of mass control during walking

Charlotte Marquardt, Thorsten Stein, Miha Dežman, Melina Beyerlein, Cagla Kettner, Tamim Asfour
article en

Abstract

Background Ankle exoskeletons alter joint kinematics during walking, yet their effects on whole-body coordination remain unclear. This study investigated how ankle exoskeleton assistance influences the structure of motor variability and center-of-mass movement during steady-state walking. Methods Twenty healthy adults walked on a treadmill at 1.1 m/s without the exoskeleton (noExo) and with active exoskeleton assistance (Exo). Whole-body kinematics were recorded. Variability was analyzed using the Uncontrolled Manifold (UCM) approach. Joint angle variability was decomposed into components that do not affect center-of-mass position (UCM || ) and components that do (UCM ⊥ ). Their ratio (UCM ratio ), reflecting the synergy stabilizing the center-of-mass, was calculated. Center-of-mass position was analyzed separately in three dimensions. Time-continuous differences across the gait cycle were evaluated using statistical parametric mapping. Results UCM || and UCM ratio showed no significant differences between conditions. UCM ⊥ was higher with exoskeleton assistance over large portions of the gait cycle (0–80%, p = 0.001; 91–100%, p = 0.022). Center-of-mass movement in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions did not differ between conditions, while small differences were observed in the vertical direction (higher in Exo at 23–31% and 75–84%, p = 0.037; lower at 48–54%, p = 0.042). Conclusion Ankle exoskeleton assistance increased joint-level variability affecting center-of-mass movement, but overall center-of-mass control was preserved, with only small changes in vertical center-of-mass displacement. Healthy adults maintained whole-body coordination despite altered mechanical conditions introduced by the exoskeleton. These findings are relevant for clinical exoskeleton use, where assistive devices should support walking without compromising center-of-mass control and balance.

Gait & PostureVol. 130
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.