Conceptualizing the development of professional journalism: A scoping review

In a constantly shifting context, where journalism is changing in response to evolving dynamics from politicians, the public, and big tech, it is crucial to understand the concepts that characterize the journalism profession. By understanding what journalism is and is not, and who is, or is not a journalist, journalists can reevaluate their added value in a changing society. This paper aims to identify key pressures that have been reshaping the journalism profession and to explore how the underlying core concepts that describe it are interconnected. It presents the results of a scoping literature review in journalism and media studies, focusing on academic literature that conceptualizes professional journalism. Our analysis shows, firstly, that a substantial body of literature refers to journalism as a collective entity; journalism at an institutional and an organizational level. Little attention has been paid to the journalist as an individual. Secondly, professional journalism is affected by both external developments, including technological, societal, and economic changes, as well as internal debates within the field. Building upon these two findings of our extensive scoping review, we propose a conceptual model that includes five factors influencing the core concepts of professional journalism: two related to journalism as a collective entity and three related to the individual journalist. Based on this model and our description of how the core concepts of professional journalism are interconnected, we propose a research agenda for further studying the professionalization of journalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261461918
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualizing the development of professional journalism: A scoping review

Cok Bakker, Yael de Haan, Koen van Turnhout, Maaike Severijnen
Journalism
Media Studies and Communication
article

Conceptualizing the development of professional journalism: A scoping review

Cok Bakker, Yael de Haan, Koen van Turnhout, Maaike Severijnen
article en

Abstract

In a constantly shifting context, where journalism is changing in response to evolving dynamics from politicians, the public, and big tech, it is crucial to understand the concepts that characterize the journalism profession. By understanding what journalism is and is not, and who is, or is not a journalist, journalists can reevaluate their added value in a changing society. This paper aims to identify key pressures that have been reshaping the journalism profession and to explore how the underlying core concepts that describe it are interconnected. It presents the results of a scoping literature review in journalism and media studies, focusing on academic literature that conceptualizes professional journalism. Our analysis shows, firstly, that a substantial body of literature refers to journalism as a collective entity; journalism at an institutional and an organizational level. Little attention has been paid to the journalist as an individual. Secondly, professional journalism is affected by both external developments, including technological, societal, and economic changes, as well as internal debates within the field. Building upon these two findings of our extensive scoping review, we propose a conceptual model that includes five factors influencing the core concepts of professional journalism: two related to journalism as a collective entity and three related to the individual journalist. Based on this model and our description of how the core concepts of professional journalism are interconnected, we propose a research agenda for further studying the professionalization of journalism.

Journalism
University of Groningen (NL), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Human Media (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.