Environment and Approvals Visual Presentation EA04: Tracking ecosystem health before, during and after energy development

Environment and Approvals Visual Presentation EA04 Protecting the environment is a key priority for Australia’s energy sector, particularly where projects operate alongside sensitive coastal ecosystems. This paper presents findings from over a decade of mangrove monitoring around Shell’s Queensland Gas Company facilities on Curtis Island, where surveys were conducted between 2010 and 2021 to track environmental health before, during and after construction. Thirty-two sites across construction zones, operational areas and natural reference locations were assessed to understand whether project activities had any lasting impact. Overall, results show no evidence of long-term damage to mangrove communities linked to the project. Variations in canopy cover, seedling density and species richness were mostly explained by natural tidal zonation, with large Rhizophora forests near the water’s edge and more mixed shrubland habitats inland. The only notable exception was a localised dieback recorded in 2017, potentially associated with short-term heat stress from flaring. This prompted additional investigation and closer monitoring. Encouragingly, strong natural recovery was observed in the years that followed, with healthy seedling recruitment and canopy regrowth. These findings highlight the value of long-term, science-based monitoring in supporting environmental approvals and stewardship. They also show that with transparent reporting and adaptive management, industry operations and important ecosystems can coexist. Sharing these lessons provides a practical example of rehabilitation and monitoring approaches that work, helping strengthen confidence in approval processes and reinforcing the role of environmental accountability in the future of Australian energy. To access the Visual Presentation click on 'Supplementary data' below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep26507
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environment and Approvals Visual Presentation EA04: Tracking ecosystem health before, during and after energy development

Felicity Melville
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Environment and Approvals Visual Presentation EA04: Tracking ecosystem health before, during and after energy development

Felicity Melville
article en

Abstract

Environment and Approvals Visual Presentation EA04 Protecting the environment is a key priority for Australia’s energy sector, particularly where projects operate alongside sensitive coastal ecosystems. This paper presents findings from over a decade of mangrove monitoring around Shell’s Queensland Gas Company facilities on Curtis Island, where surveys were conducted between 2010 and 2021 to track environmental health before, during and after construction. Thirty-two sites across construction zones, operational areas and natural reference locations were assessed to understand whether project activities had any lasting impact. Overall, results show no evidence of long-term damage to mangrove communities linked to the project. Variations in canopy cover, seedling density and species richness were mostly explained by natural tidal zonation, with large Rhizophora forests near the water’s edge and more mixed shrubland habitats inland. The only notable exception was a localised dieback recorded in 2017, potentially associated with short-term heat stress from flaring. This prompted additional investigation and closer monitoring. Encouragingly, strong natural recovery was observed in the years that followed, with healthy seedling recruitment and canopy regrowth. These findings highlight the value of long-term, science-based monitoring in supporting environmental approvals and stewardship. They also show that with transparent reporting and adaptive management, industry operations and important ecosystems can coexist. Sharing these lessons provides a practical example of rehabilitation and monitoring approaches that work, helping strengthen confidence in approval processes and reinforcing the role of environmental accountability in the future of Australian energy. To access the Visual Presentation click on 'Supplementary data' below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 66(S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.