A Community-Level Digital Health Readiness Index for the US

Importance: Digital health services are expanding, yet community readiness for digital care varies widely. Without a validated, granular measure of readiness, health systems and policymakers cannot reliably enable targeted support or monitor equitable deployment. Objective: To develop and validate a reproducible census tract-level index of community digital health readiness integrating socioeconomic conditions, access to care, and digital connectivity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional index development and validation study analyzed public data from 2018 to 2022. The Digital Health Index (DHI) was constructed from 21 indicators with equal weighting representing 3 domains: socioeconomic, health access, and connectivity. Content validity was assessed using a 2-round Delphi panel including 37 experts. Structural validity was assessed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent validity was assessed against the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and Digital Divide Index (DDI). External validity was assessed using health care spending. Robustness was assessed using leave-one-out, weight-perturbation, and group-based cross-validation analysis. Data were analyzed between June 2023 and April 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were validation metrics, including factor structure fit indices, correlations with established indices, association with health care spending per capita, and Delphi consensus rates for each indicator. Robustness outcomes included stability of tract rankings under indicator removal or weight changes. Results: The DHI was computed for 85 396 US census tracts across all 50 states. DHI scores correlated with SVI, ADI, and DDI scores (Spearman ρ = 0.61-0.84) but prioritized different low-readiness communities, with only 33% to 44% overlap between tracts in the highest DHI decile and those in the highest SVI, ADI, or DDI deciles. Health care spending showed similar inverse associations across indices. DHI rankings remained stable in sensitivity analyses. All 21 indicators met Delphi consensus criteria after 1 or 2 rounds. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional index development and validation study, a reproducible measure of community digital health readiness was constructed at the census tract level, integrating socioeconomic, access, and connectivity factors. The DHI may help health systems, public agencies, and researchers identify communities requiring support and track readiness over time as digital health and artificial intelligence initiatives expand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.19372
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Community-Level Digital Health Readiness Index for the US

Zhaoqiang Zhou, Philip McDaniel, John Geracitano, Grace Riehm et al.
JAMA Network Open
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

A Community-Level Digital Health Readiness Index for the US

Zhaoqiang Zhou, Philip McDaniel, John Geracitano, Grace Riehm, Saif Khairat, Christopher M. Shea, David McSwain
article en

Abstract

Importance: Digital health services are expanding, yet community readiness for digital care varies widely. Without a validated, granular measure of readiness, health systems and policymakers cannot reliably enable targeted support or monitor equitable deployment. Objective: To develop and validate a reproducible census tract-level index of community digital health readiness integrating socioeconomic conditions, access to care, and digital connectivity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional index development and validation study analyzed public data from 2018 to 2022. The Digital Health Index (DHI) was constructed from 21 indicators with equal weighting representing 3 domains: socioeconomic, health access, and connectivity. Content validity was assessed using a 2-round Delphi panel including 37 experts. Structural validity was assessed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent validity was assessed against the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and Digital Divide Index (DDI). External validity was assessed using health care spending. Robustness was assessed using leave-one-out, weight-perturbation, and group-based cross-validation analysis. Data were analyzed between June 2023 and April 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were validation metrics, including factor structure fit indices, correlations with established indices, association with health care spending per capita, and Delphi consensus rates for each indicator. Robustness outcomes included stability of tract rankings under indicator removal or weight changes. Results: The DHI was computed for 85 396 US census tracts across all 50 states. DHI scores correlated with SVI, ADI, and DDI scores (Spearman ρ = 0.61-0.84) but prioritized different low-readiness communities, with only 33% to 44% overlap between tracts in the highest DHI decile and those in the highest SVI, ADI, or DDI deciles. Health care spending showed similar inverse associations across indices. DHI rankings remained stable in sensitivity analyses. All 21 indicators met Delphi consensus criteria after 1 or 2 rounds. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional index development and validation study, a reproducible measure of community digital health readiness was constructed at the census tract level, integrating socioeconomic, access, and connectivity factors. The DHI may help health systems, public agencies, and researchers identify communities requiring support and track readiness over time as digital health and artificial intelligence initiatives expand.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(6)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), North Carolina Institute of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.