Preliminary Evaluation of a Novel Lupus Anticoagulant Activity Assay Unaffected by Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND: In Japan, clinical laboratories commonly assess lupus anticoagulant (LA) activity using phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays as part of the diagnostic evaluation of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, LA detection involves complex procedures and may yield false-positive results in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aimed to clarify the effects of anticoagulants on guideline-based LA testing (diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and/or LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)) and to evaluate whether they interfere with accurate LA assessment. We also explore a simple one-step method to minimize anticoagulant interference and improve diagnostic efficiency. METHODS: We developed a one-step method for assessing LA activity by calculating the LA-sensitivity ratio (LA-SR), defined as the ratio of APTT measured using high- and low-sensitivity APTT reagents. The clinical utility of the LA-SR assay was evaluated using plasma samples from 57 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 74 patients with prolonged APTT, and DOAC-spiked plasmas. RESULTS: The method showed agreement with the guideline-based LA testing. Of the 57 cases, 14 were LA-positive and 38 were LA-negative according to guideline-based testing. Among the 43 cases classified as LA-negative, five showed elevated LA-SR values despite negative guideline-based results. The LA-SR assay was minimally affected by DOACs, warfarin, heparin, or coagulation factor deficiencies. CONCLUSION: This LA-SR-based method may serve as a useful screening tool for the evaluation of LA activity. A negative LA-SR result may help identify samples unlikely to have LA activity, while positive results should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed using guideline-based testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.70292
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary Evaluation of a Novel Lupus Anticoagulant Activity Assay Unaffected by Anticoagulants

Junzo Nojima, Risa Kaneshige, Yukari Motoki, Ayu Hidaka et al.
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Preliminary Evaluation of a Novel Lupus Anticoagulant Activity Assay Unaffected by Anticoagulants

Junzo Nojima, Risa Kaneshige, Yukari Motoki, Ayu Hidaka, Seika Nakamura
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Japan, clinical laboratories commonly assess lupus anticoagulant (LA) activity using phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays as part of the diagnostic evaluation of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, LA detection involves complex procedures and may yield false-positive results in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aimed to clarify the effects of anticoagulants on guideline-based LA testing (diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and/or LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)) and to evaluate whether they interfere with accurate LA assessment. We also explore a simple one-step method to minimize anticoagulant interference and improve diagnostic efficiency. METHODS: We developed a one-step method for assessing LA activity by calculating the LA-sensitivity ratio (LA-SR), defined as the ratio of APTT measured using high- and low-sensitivity APTT reagents. The clinical utility of the LA-SR assay was evaluated using plasma samples from 57 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 74 patients with prolonged APTT, and DOAC-spiked plasmas. RESULTS: The method showed agreement with the guideline-based LA testing. Of the 57 cases, 14 were LA-positive and 38 were LA-negative according to guideline-based testing. Among the 43 cases classified as LA-negative, five showed elevated LA-SR values despite negative guideline-based results. The LA-SR assay was minimally affected by DOACs, warfarin, heparin, or coagulation factor deficiencies. CONCLUSION: This LA-SR-based method may serve as a useful screening tool for the evaluation of LA activity. A negative LA-SR result may help identify samples unlikely to have LA activity, while positive results should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed using guideline-based testing.

Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Yamaguchi University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preliminary Evaluation of a Novel Lupus Anticoagulant Activity Assay Unaffected by Anticoagulants — Junzo Nojima, Risa Kaneshige, et al. · Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS