Quantifying and modeling fabric surface roughness discrepancy: Consistency between physical and digital textures in online shopping

In digital textile commerce, the absence of tactile interaction limits consumers’ ability to perceive fabric properties, often leading to mismatched expectations and product dissatisfaction. This study aimed to quantify the perceptual discrepancy in surface roughness (RDP) between physical fabrics and their digital representations and to identify structural parameters that influence this discrepancy. Plain- and twill-woven fabric specimens were prepared with varying densities, weights, and thicknesses. Surface roughness of physical fabrics was measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM), while digital roughness values were extracted from scanned images using ImageJ. Statistical analyses, including correlation and regression modeling, were applied to identify key predictors of RDP. Results showed that in plain-woven fabrics, lower weft density and higher warp density under fixed fabric weight conditions yielded the lowest RDP values, whereas in twill-woven fabrics, the perceptual gap was minimized at higher fabric weights and lower weft densities. These findings provide practical insights for improving visual–tactile alignment in virtual textile presentation and can inform fabric structural design for enhanced accuracy in online representation. Future research may explore nonlinear modeling and multisensory feedback systems to further reduce perceptual discrepancies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352028
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying and modeling fabric surface roughness discrepancy: Consistency between physical and digital textures in online shopping

Eugene Lee, Youngjoo Chae
PLoS ONE
Textile materials and evaluations
article

Quantifying and modeling fabric surface roughness discrepancy: Consistency between physical and digital textures in online shopping

Eugene Lee, Youngjoo Chae
article en

Abstract

In digital textile commerce, the absence of tactile interaction limits consumers’ ability to perceive fabric properties, often leading to mismatched expectations and product dissatisfaction. This study aimed to quantify the perceptual discrepancy in surface roughness (RDP) between physical fabrics and their digital representations and to identify structural parameters that influence this discrepancy. Plain- and twill-woven fabric specimens were prepared with varying densities, weights, and thicknesses. Surface roughness of physical fabrics was measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM), while digital roughness values were extracted from scanned images using ImageJ. Statistical analyses, including correlation and regression modeling, were applied to identify key predictors of RDP. Results showed that in plain-woven fabrics, lower weft density and higher warp density under fixed fabric weight conditions yielded the lowest RDP values, whereas in twill-woven fabrics, the perceptual gap was minimized at higher fabric weights and lower weft densities. These findings provide practical insights for improving visual–tactile alignment in virtual textile presentation and can inform fabric structural design for enhanced accuracy in online representation. Future research may explore nonlinear modeling and multisensory feedback systems to further reduce perceptual discrepancies.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
Chungbuk National University (KR), Yonsei University (KR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.