Risk factors associated with deep perineal wound dehiscence after second‐degree perineal tears or episiotomy

Abstract Introduction Second‐degree perineal tears and episiotomies, involving the bulbocavernosus and/or superficial transverse perineal muscles, are common after vaginal birth and may lead to wound dehiscence, infection, and long‐term pelvic floor dysfunction. Despite this, risk factors for deep wound dehiscence involving perineal musculature remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to identify risk factors for wound dehiscence in second‐degree tears and episiotomies to inform potential use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Material and Methods A single‐center case–control study (1:2 ratio) was conducted including 105 cases with 2nd degree perineal tears or episiotomies complicated by deep wound dehiscence, diagnosed within two weeks postpartum and 210 controls with second‐degree tears or episiotomies without dehiscence. Exposure data were retrieved from medical records. Univariate analyses were performed on a priori selected exposure variables, using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Variable selection used Lasso regression with leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. Multivariate logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Women with wound dehiscence were more often vaginal primiparas (87% vs 69%, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of episiotomy (33% vs 7%, p < 0.001). Intrapartum antibiotics were administered less frequently among cases (7% vs 20%, p = 0.002). Cases had longer second stage of labor, more active pushing, and greater postpartum bleeding. After multivariate adjustment, only episiotomy (aOR 4.40, 95% CI 2.10–9.64) and intrapartum antibiotic administration (aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07–0.50) remained significantly associated with wound dehiscence. Conclusions Episiotomy substantially increased the risk of deep perineal wound dehiscence compared with spontaneous second‐degree perineal tears, while intrapartum antibiotics were protective. These findings support selective episiotomy use and suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce this risk in women with second‐degree perineal tears or episiotomies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70285
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors associated with deep perineal wound dehiscence after second‐degree perineal tears or episiotomy

E. Epstein, Denise Golmann, Josefin Hedström, Ida Bergman
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Risk factors associated with deep perineal wound dehiscence after second‐degree perineal tears or episiotomy

E. Epstein, Denise Golmann, Josefin Hedström, Ida Bergman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Second‐degree perineal tears and episiotomies, involving the bulbocavernosus and/or superficial transverse perineal muscles, are common after vaginal birth and may lead to wound dehiscence, infection, and long‐term pelvic floor dysfunction. Despite this, risk factors for deep wound dehiscence involving perineal musculature remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to identify risk factors for wound dehiscence in second‐degree tears and episiotomies to inform potential use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Material and Methods A single‐center case–control study (1:2 ratio) was conducted including 105 cases with 2nd degree perineal tears or episiotomies complicated by deep wound dehiscence, diagnosed within two weeks postpartum and 210 controls with second‐degree tears or episiotomies without dehiscence. Exposure data were retrieved from medical records. Univariate analyses were performed on a priori selected exposure variables, using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Variable selection used Lasso regression with leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. Multivariate logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Women with wound dehiscence were more often vaginal primiparas (87% vs 69%, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of episiotomy (33% vs 7%, p < 0.001). Intrapartum antibiotics were administered less frequently among cases (7% vs 20%, p = 0.002). Cases had longer second stage of labor, more active pushing, and greater postpartum bleeding. After multivariate adjustment, only episiotomy (aOR 4.40, 95% CI 2.10–9.64) and intrapartum antibiotic administration (aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07–0.50) remained significantly associated with wound dehiscence. Conclusions Episiotomy substantially increased the risk of deep perineal wound dehiscence compared with spontaneous second‐degree perineal tears, while intrapartum antibiotics were protective. These findings support selective episiotomy use and suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce this risk in women with second‐degree perineal tears or episiotomies.

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.