Impact of lung cancer discovery mode on cancer outcomes: data from the KBP-2020-CPHG study

Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early-stage detection significantly improves prognosis, but most diagnoses are made at advanced stages due to limited early symptoms. This real-world study from the KBP-2020-CPHG cohort evaluated clinical characteristics and overall survival according to the mode of lung cancer discovery. Patients and methods KBP-2020-CPHG is a nationwide prospective cohort of 8999 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer in non-academic French hospitals. Patients were categorized by mode of lung cancer discovery as symptomatic presentation, incidental finding, or individual screening. Baseline characteristics and survival were compared across groups. Results Among 8943 patients with available data, 6404 (71.6%) were diagnosed symptomatically, 2178 (24.4%) incidentally, and 361 (4.0%) through opportunistic screening in a non-organized context. Overall, 71.0%, 82.5%, and 89.1% of patients, respectively, had performance status 0/1 ( p <0.0001), and 3.4%, 6.4%, and 6.9% had lepidic adenocarcinoma ( p <0.001). Early-stage disease (stages 0-II) was diagnosed in 54.6% of screened patients, 40.5% of incidentally diagnosed patients and just 10.6% of symptomatically diagnosed patients ( p <0.0001). Median overall survival was 45.6, 30.0, and 11.5 months, respectively. Corresponding 3-year overall survival rates were 59.0%, 46.3%, and 26.4%. Conclusion The mode of lung cancer discovery was associated with stage at diagnosis and survival. Compared with symptomatic diagnosis, screening and incidental detection were associated with earlier stage of diagnosis and significantly better overall survival. These findings support the broader implementation of structured early-detection strategies, including screening programs, to improve the prognosis of patients with lung cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ERJ Open Research
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00001-2026
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of lung cancer discovery mode on cancer outcomes: data from the KBP-2020-CPHG study

Emmanuel Grolleau, C. Maurer, D. Debieuvre, Nicolae Banciu et al.
ERJ Open Research
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Impact of lung cancer discovery mode on cancer outcomes: data from the KBP-2020-CPHG study

Emmanuel Grolleau, C. Maurer, D. Debieuvre, Nicolae Banciu, Alexia Letierce, J.-M. Peloni, Jean-Philippe Kraemer, Sébastien Couraud, Hervé Le Floch, Stéphane Raymond
article en

Abstract

Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early-stage detection significantly improves prognosis, but most diagnoses are made at advanced stages due to limited early symptoms. This real-world study from the KBP-2020-CPHG cohort evaluated clinical characteristics and overall survival according to the mode of lung cancer discovery. Patients and methods KBP-2020-CPHG is a nationwide prospective cohort of 8999 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer in non-academic French hospitals. Patients were categorized by mode of lung cancer discovery as symptomatic presentation, incidental finding, or individual screening. Baseline characteristics and survival were compared across groups. Results Among 8943 patients with available data, 6404 (71.6%) were diagnosed symptomatically, 2178 (24.4%) incidentally, and 361 (4.0%) through opportunistic screening in a non-organized context. Overall, 71.0%, 82.5%, and 89.1% of patients, respectively, had performance status 0/1 ( p <0.0001), and 3.4%, 6.4%, and 6.9% had lepidic adenocarcinoma ( p <0.001). Early-stage disease (stages 0-II) was diagnosed in 54.6% of screened patients, 40.5% of incidentally diagnosed patients and just 10.6% of symptomatically diagnosed patients ( p <0.0001). Median overall survival was 45.6, 30.0, and 11.5 months, respectively. Corresponding 3-year overall survival rates were 59.0%, 46.3%, and 26.4%. Conclusion The mode of lung cancer discovery was associated with stage at diagnosis and survival. Compared with symptomatic diagnosis, screening and incidental detection were associated with earlier stage of diagnosis and significantly better overall survival. These findings support the broader implementation of structured early-detection strategies, including screening programs, to improve the prognosis of patients with lung cancer.

ERJ Open Research
École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Tarbes (FR), Université de Toulon (FR), Toulon Var Technologies (France) (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Hôpital Émile-Roux (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre (FR), Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR), BA Systèmes (France) (FR), Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon-La Seyne-sur-Mer (FR), Groupe Hospitalier de la Région de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace (FR), Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy Montfermeil (FR), Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Fréjus Saint-Raphaël (FR), Infirmerie Protestante (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.