Multilevel Determinants of Predoctoral TMD Education: A CFIR‐Guided National Survey Highlighting Opportunities for Primary‐Care–Based Training

BACKGROUND: Variability exists in how US dental schools integrate predoctoral temporomandibular disorder (TMD) training, yet multilevel determinants influencing implementation are underexplored. This study applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to examine differences in predoctoral TMD training and challenges in implementing CODA standards from leadership perspectives. METHOD: A CFIR-guided REDCap survey was distributed to deans/associate deans of academic affairs across all 75 dental schools (September, 2025 to October, 2025), assessing TMD screening, management, student exposure, and implementation challenges. Schools were classified into TMD-educational models based on orofacial pain (OFP) postgraduate affiliation (Model 1), presence of OFP specialists managing TMD patients (Model 2), OFP specialists providing didactic instruction only (Model 3), and absence thereof (Model 4). Outcomes were compared across models using chi-square tests; thematic analysis summarized implementation challenges via CFIR constructs. RESULTS: Of 38 responses, 84.2% provided both didactic and clinical TMD instruction and routine screening. Overall, 97.4% managed TMD patients, with modalities varying by models (p < 0.001). Model 4 schools were significantly less likely to provide TMD management (p = 0.033). Confidence in meeting CODA standards was moderate-to-high for didactic (84.0 ± 18.2 on 0-100 scale, 100 = "high confidence") and clinical (77.3 ± 21.0) components. Perceived challenges differed across models (p = 0.006), including lack of specialists (Model 4), limited general faculty trained in TMD (Models 2 and 3) and patient availability, curricular constraints (Models 1, 2, and 4), and institutional barriers. CONCLUSION: Variability in TMD education reflects multilevel implementation determinants. Embedding TMD competencies in a primary-care framework, strengthening OFP faculty recruitment, and enhancing curricular integration could improve consistency and implementation fidelity nationwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dental Education
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70290
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilevel Determinants of Predoctoral TMD Education: A CFIR‐Guided National Survey Highlighting Opportunities for Primary‐Care–Based Training

Seema Kurup, Gary D. Klasser, Sowmya Ananthan, Linda Sangalli et al.
Journal of Dental Education
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Multilevel Determinants of Predoctoral TMD Education: A CFIR‐Guided National Survey Highlighting Opportunities for Primary‐Care–Based Training

Seema Kurup, Gary D. Klasser, Sowmya Ananthan, Linda Sangalli, Navdeep Singh, Jeff Shaefer, Hong Chen, James Fricton, James Hawkins, Shawn McMahon
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variability exists in how US dental schools integrate predoctoral temporomandibular disorder (TMD) training, yet multilevel determinants influencing implementation are underexplored. This study applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to examine differences in predoctoral TMD training and challenges in implementing CODA standards from leadership perspectives. METHOD: A CFIR-guided REDCap survey was distributed to deans/associate deans of academic affairs across all 75 dental schools (September, 2025 to October, 2025), assessing TMD screening, management, student exposure, and implementation challenges. Schools were classified into TMD-educational models based on orofacial pain (OFP) postgraduate affiliation (Model 1), presence of OFP specialists managing TMD patients (Model 2), OFP specialists providing didactic instruction only (Model 3), and absence thereof (Model 4). Outcomes were compared across models using chi-square tests; thematic analysis summarized implementation challenges via CFIR constructs. RESULTS: Of 38 responses, 84.2% provided both didactic and clinical TMD instruction and routine screening. Overall, 97.4% managed TMD patients, with modalities varying by models (p < 0.001). Model 4 schools were significantly less likely to provide TMD management (p = 0.033). Confidence in meeting CODA standards was moderate-to-high for didactic (84.0 ± 18.2 on 0-100 scale, 100 = "high confidence") and clinical (77.3 ± 21.0) components. Perceived challenges differed across models (p = 0.006), including lack of specialists (Model 4), limited general faculty trained in TMD (Models 2 and 3) and patient availability, curricular constraints (Models 1, 2, and 4), and institutional barriers. CONCLUSION: Variability in TMD education reflects multilevel implementation determinants. Embedding TMD competencies in a primary-care framework, strengthening OFP faculty recruitment, and enhancing curricular integration could improve consistency and implementation fidelity nationwide.

Journal of Dental Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Midwestern University (US), Naval Medical Research Command (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), The Ohio State University (US), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US), UConn Health (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.