Machine Learning Eliminates Reanalysis Warm Bias and Reveals Weaker Winter Surface Cooling Over Arctic Sea Ice

Abstract The surface energy budget governs Arctic sea‐ice growth/melt, yet observations are sparse, and reanalysis data sets suffer from systematic biases. Here, we train a neural network with observational data to bias‐correct hourly ERA5 fluxes over Arctic ice‐covered regions (≥70°N; sea‐ice concentration >80%) for 1994–2024. Training data cover two full seasonal cycles and different sea‐ice regimes. The neural network reduces RMSE for net shortwave radiation by ∼40%, downward longwave radiation by ∼16% and the total surface energy budget by ∼55%, eliminating the wintertime warm bias of ∼4 K in ERA5. Wintertime surface cooling is reduced by ∼50%, yielding thermodynamic ice‐growth estimates of ∼80–120 cm, consistent with SMOS–CryoSat satellite thickness increases and in contrast to the 150–200 cm growth implied by ERA5. Our bias‐corrected data capture the observed clear/cloudy states of the winter boundary layer and can be used to study Arctic climatology, evaluate climate models and drive sea‐ice‐ocean models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl121289
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Eliminates Reanalysis Warm Bias and Reveals Weaker Winter Surface Cooling Over Arctic Sea Ice

Akil Hossain, Felix Pithan, Christopher J. Cox, Paul Keil et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Machine Learning Eliminates Reanalysis Warm Bias and Reveals Weaker Winter Surface Cooling Over Arctic Sea Ice

Akil Hossain, Felix Pithan, Christopher J. Cox, Paul Keil, Jutta Vüllers, Von P. Walden, Stephen R. Hudson, Michael Tjernström, Mats A. Granskog, Michael Gallagher, Heather Guy, Ian M. Brooks, Matthew D. Shupe, Harsh Grover, P. Ola G. Persson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The surface energy budget governs Arctic sea‐ice growth/melt, yet observations are sparse, and reanalysis data sets suffer from systematic biases. Here, we train a neural network with observational data to bias‐correct hourly ERA5 fluxes over Arctic ice‐covered regions (≥70°N; sea‐ice concentration >80%) for 1994–2024. Training data cover two full seasonal cycles and different sea‐ice regimes. The neural network reduces RMSE for net shortwave radiation by ∼40%, downward longwave radiation by ∼16% and the total surface energy budget by ∼55%, eliminating the wintertime warm bias of ∼4 K in ERA5. Wintertime surface cooling is reduced by ∼50%, yielding thermodynamic ice‐growth estimates of ∼80–120 cm, consistent with SMOS–CryoSat satellite thickness increases and in contrast to the 150–200 cm growth implied by ERA5. Our bias‐corrected data capture the observed clear/cloudy states of the winter boundary layer and can be used to study Arctic climatology, evaluate climate models and drive sea‐ice‐ocean models.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(12)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), University of Leeds (GB), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Bremen (DE), University of Colorado Boulder (US), German Climate Computing Centre (DE), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB), NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (US), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE), Bolin Centre for Climate Research (SE), Washington State University (US), Norwegian Polar Institute (NO)
Polarforskningssekretariatet, Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing Program
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.