A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mobility: Validation of the Functional Ambulation and Stair Test in Older Adults

Background/Objectives: Falls have devastating consequences for older adults. The Functional Ambulation and Stair Test (FAST) was developed to characterize older adult mobility and eventual fall risk. This project aimed to determine the criterion validity of the FAST assessment by comparing the relationship between FAST outcomes and existing gold-standard clinical assessments of mobility and fall risk. A secondary aim was assessing the FAST’s capacity to elicit dual-task effects in older adults. Methods: The FAST is a multi-faceted mobility assessment combining stair navigation, turning and level-ground walking; total time and time spent in each phase are the calculated outcomes. Data from 199 older adults completing the FAST, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) at comfortable and fast speed were evaluated. Relationships between the FAST and clinical outcomes were evaluated with Spearman’s correlations. The FAST and TUG were assessed under single- and dual-task conditions; linear mixed models evaluated the dual-task effects for overall FAST time and each phase. Results: Spearman’s correlations between the FAST and the BBS, TUG, 10MWT comfortable and 10MWT fast were −0.65, 0.88, −0.79, and −0.83, respectively. Participants experienced an 8.6% and 13.2% dual-task cost in the FAST and TUG, respectively. The greatest dual-task cost during the FAST was in the gait initiation, walking, and wide turn phases. Conclusions: Agreement between the FAST and gold-standard clinical mobility assessments confirms the criterion validity of the FAST. Delineation of mobility phases via the FAST offers insight into specific mobility deficits. Future work is ongoing to evaluate the FAST as a fall risk assessment in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124782
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mobility: Validation of the Functional Ambulation and Stair Test in Older Adults

Sara Davidson, Jay L. Alberts, Anson B. Rosenfeldt, John Gardner et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mobility: Validation of the Functional Ambulation and Stair Test in Older Adults

Sara Davidson, Jay L. Alberts, Anson B. Rosenfeldt, John Gardner, J. Klein, Emily Hopkins, Eric Zimmerman, Elizabeth Claire Weyman Heller, Grant Alberts, Louie Sutte, Benjamin Broz
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Falls have devastating consequences for older adults. The Functional Ambulation and Stair Test (FAST) was developed to characterize older adult mobility and eventual fall risk. This project aimed to determine the criterion validity of the FAST assessment by comparing the relationship between FAST outcomes and existing gold-standard clinical assessments of mobility and fall risk. A secondary aim was assessing the FAST’s capacity to elicit dual-task effects in older adults. Methods: The FAST is a multi-faceted mobility assessment combining stair navigation, turning and level-ground walking; total time and time spent in each phase are the calculated outcomes. Data from 199 older adults completing the FAST, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT) at comfortable and fast speed were evaluated. Relationships between the FAST and clinical outcomes were evaluated with Spearman’s correlations. The FAST and TUG were assessed under single- and dual-task conditions; linear mixed models evaluated the dual-task effects for overall FAST time and each phase. Results: Spearman’s correlations between the FAST and the BBS, TUG, 10MWT comfortable and 10MWT fast were −0.65, 0.88, −0.79, and −0.83, respectively. Participants experienced an 8.6% and 13.2% dual-task cost in the FAST and TUG, respectively. The greatest dual-task cost during the FAST was in the gait initiation, walking, and wide turn phases. Conclusions: Agreement between the FAST and gold-standard clinical mobility assessments confirms the criterion validity of the FAST. Delineation of mobility phases via the FAST offers insight into specific mobility deficits. Future work is ongoing to evaluate the FAST as a fall risk assessment in older adults.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(12)
Cleveland State University (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), The Neurological Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.