Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Discourse: Methodological Reflections for Nursing Practice

Social media offers large-scale access to mental health discourse, enabling population-level insights into distress, support-seeking, and community dynamics relevant to person-centered care. Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods can analyze naturally occurring expressions to complement clinical understanding by identifying patterns across individuals and groups. This study examines interaction-based classification and sentiment analysis approaches—including traditional machine learning, transformer models, and Large Language Models (LLMs) applied to Twitter data from self-disclosing users across multiple mental health conditions. Interaction features showed moderate ability to distinguish mental health -related accounts from controls but limited specificity across conditions. Sentiment patterns were broadly consistent across models, with mostly neutral discourse and higher negative sentiment in some diagnostic communities. However, LLMs demonstrated sensitivity to prompting and occasionally produced inconsistent outputs, raising concerns about reproducibility, interpretability, and ethical use. Overall, AI approaches show promise but remain probabilistic and context dependent. They should complement, not replace, clinical judgment. Transparent methods, attention to bias, and ethical oversight are essential to ensure these tools support equitable, person-centered mental health care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2026.2665756
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Discourse: Methodological Reflections for Nursing Practice

Chiung‐Jung Wu, Patrick C. K. Hung
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Mental Health via Writing
article

Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Discourse: Methodological Reflections for Nursing Practice

Chiung‐Jung Wu, Patrick C. K. Hung
article en

Abstract

Social media offers large-scale access to mental health discourse, enabling population-level insights into distress, support-seeking, and community dynamics relevant to person-centered care. Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods can analyze naturally occurring expressions to complement clinical understanding by identifying patterns across individuals and groups. This study examines interaction-based classification and sentiment analysis approaches—including traditional machine learning, transformer models, and Large Language Models (LLMs) applied to Twitter data from self-disclosing users across multiple mental health conditions. Interaction features showed moderate ability to distinguish mental health -related accounts from controls but limited specificity across conditions. Sentiment patterns were broadly consistent across models, with mostly neutral discourse and higher negative sentiment in some diagnostic communities. However, LLMs demonstrated sensitivity to prompting and occasionally produced inconsistent outputs, raising concerns about reproducibility, interpretability, and ethical use. Overall, AI approaches show promise but remain probabilistic and context dependent. They should complement, not replace, clinical judgment. Transparent methods, attention to bias, and ethical oversight are essential to ensure these tools support equitable, person-centered mental health care.

Issues in Mental Health Nursing
University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Ontario Tech University (CA), Health Innovations (United States) (US), VinUniversity (VN), Abiola Ajimobi Technical University Ibadan (NG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.