Is there an effect of the start day of luteal phase support on pregnancy outcomes in natural vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer?

To evaluate whether the timing of luteal phase support (LPS) initiation affects pregnancy outcomes in natural cycle vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (NC-FET) cycles. This retrospective cohort study included NC-FET cycles performed between January 2022 and December 2024 at a tertiary university fertility center. Only true natural cycles with blastocyst transfer were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the initiation of LPS: two days before embryo transfer (Group 1) or on the day of embryo transfer (Group 2). All patients received vaginal and subcutaneous progesterone for LPS. Baseline characteristics, embryo features, serum progesterone levels on transfer day, and reproductive outcomes were compared. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify factors associated with clinical pregnancy. A total of 246 NC-FET cycles were analyzed (Group 1: n = 172; Group 2: n = 74). Baseline characteristics, embryo quality, and transfer parameters were comparable between groups. Serum progesterone levels on the day of transfer were significantly higher in Group 1 (32.1 ± 13.0 ng/mL) compared with Group 2 (10.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL; p = 0.001). However, total pregnancy rate (66.2% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.006), clinical pregnancy rate (56.8% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.020), and live birth rate (52.7% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.024) were significantly higher in Group 2. Logistic regression analysis showed that initiation of LPS on the day of transfer was independently associated with increased clinical pregnancy (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.17–4.81). Serum progesterone level did not predict pregnancy outcomes. In NC-FET cycles, initiating luteal phase support on the day of embryo transfer is associated with improved pregnancy and live birth rates compared with earlier initiation, despite lower serum progesterone levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09513-3
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there an effect of the start day of luteal phase support on pregnancy outcomes in natural vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer?

Bülent Berker, Batuhan Turgay, Batuhan Özmen, Murat Sönmezer et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Is there an effect of the start day of luteal phase support on pregnancy outcomes in natural vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer?

Bülent Berker, Batuhan Turgay, Batuhan Özmen, Murat Sönmezer, Yavuz Emre Şükür, Ruşen Aytaç, Cem Somer Atabekoğlu
article en

Abstract

To evaluate whether the timing of luteal phase support (LPS) initiation affects pregnancy outcomes in natural cycle vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (NC-FET) cycles. This retrospective cohort study included NC-FET cycles performed between January 2022 and December 2024 at a tertiary university fertility center. Only true natural cycles with blastocyst transfer were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the initiation of LPS: two days before embryo transfer (Group 1) or on the day of embryo transfer (Group 2). All patients received vaginal and subcutaneous progesterone for LPS. Baseline characteristics, embryo features, serum progesterone levels on transfer day, and reproductive outcomes were compared. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify factors associated with clinical pregnancy. A total of 246 NC-FET cycles were analyzed (Group 1: n = 172; Group 2: n = 74). Baseline characteristics, embryo quality, and transfer parameters were comparable between groups. Serum progesterone levels on the day of transfer were significantly higher in Group 1 (32.1 ± 13.0 ng/mL) compared with Group 2 (10.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL; p = 0.001). However, total pregnancy rate (66.2% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.006), clinical pregnancy rate (56.8% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.020), and live birth rate (52.7% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.024) were significantly higher in Group 2. Logistic regression analysis showed that initiation of LPS on the day of transfer was independently associated with increased clinical pregnancy (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.17–4.81). Serum progesterone level did not predict pregnancy outcomes. In NC-FET cycles, initiating luteal phase support on the day of embryo transfer is associated with improved pregnancy and live birth rates compared with earlier initiation, despite lower serum progesterone levels.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Ankara University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.