Strategies for Road Project Execution with Land Access Restrictions: A Systematic Review

Over the past decade the industry has developed technical, contractual and managerial tools for road construction without recognizing their capacity as solutions to land access restrictions. This systematic review analyzes the strategies for executing road projects under such restrictions. Following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, 51 indexed articles (2015–2026) retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science were examined and classified into land access restrictions, execution strategies (four families: technical–constructive, project management, social–institutional and contractual–legal) and impact on performance. Strategies are documented in 64.7% of the studies, but only 25.5% analyze them as an object, which explains why they have not been recognized as available solutions. The four families are not alternatives: they operate at different moments of the cycle, and their effectiveness depends on the type of restriction, the moment of activation and the institutional capacity, a determining variable that the corpus does not measure. Treating the restriction as a planning variable, rather than a contingency, distinguishes the projects with positive impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122431
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for Road Project Execution with Land Access Restrictions: A Systematic Review

Luis Mayo-Alvarez, Fabiola Pasapera-Trujillo
Buildings
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Strategies for Road Project Execution with Land Access Restrictions: A Systematic Review

Luis Mayo-Alvarez, Fabiola Pasapera-Trujillo
article en

Abstract

Over the past decade the industry has developed technical, contractual and managerial tools for road construction without recognizing their capacity as solutions to land access restrictions. This systematic review analyzes the strategies for executing road projects under such restrictions. Following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, 51 indexed articles (2015–2026) retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science were examined and classified into land access restrictions, execution strategies (four families: technical–constructive, project management, social–institutional and contractual–legal) and impact on performance. Strategies are documented in 64.7% of the studies, but only 25.5% analyze them as an object, which explains why they have not been recognized as available solutions. The four families are not alternatives: they operate at different moments of the cycle, and their effectiveness depends on the type of restriction, the moment of activation and the institutional capacity, a determining variable that the corpus does not measure. Treating the restriction as a planning variable, rather than a contingency, distinguishes the projects with positive impact.

BuildingsVol. 16(12)
Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies for Road Project Execution with Land Access Restrictions: A Systematic Review — Luis Mayo-Alvarez, Fabiola Pasapera-Trujillo · Buildings (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS