Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate a deep-learning (DL)-based framework to automatically perform breast cancer (BC) metabolic staging on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT, and to assess agreement among DL-based, nuclear medicine (NM) physician-based, and clinical staging. METHODS: F]FDG avid lesions suspected of malignancy were segmented by an NM physician and classified into four key tumor regions: primary tumor (pT), regional axillary lymph nodes (ALN), extra-axillary locoregional nodes (extra-ALN), and distant metastases (dM). Data were split into training (n = 303) and testing (n = 100) sets using a stratified approach. Class-specific DL segmentation networks were developed. A post-processing pipeline was implemented to derive metabolic TNM staging from the DL-based segmentation. Using NM-based and clinical staging segmentation as reference, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for T, N, and M. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient (DC) and lesion detection (LD) metrics. NM-based metabolic staging was also compared with clinical staging. RESULTS: DL-based staging showed concordance with NM-based/clinical staging of 75/62%, 87/74%, and 83/82% for T, N, and M, respectively. For N3 (presence of extra-ALN) and M1 (presence of dM), where [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is particularly relevant, sensitivity/specificity of DL-based (NM-based reference) were 0.86/0.96, and 0.97/0.78, respectively. Segmentation performance was good to excellent for pT, ALN, and dM (median DC ≥ 0.83 and LD ≥ 0.78), and moderate for extra-ALN (median DC = 0.63 and LD ≥ 0.71). NM-based metabolic staging agreed with clinical staging in 63%, 80%, and 99% of cases for T, N, and M, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although expert supervision remains essential, the developed DL-based framework demonstrates potential as a supportive tool for metabolic staging in BC patients, facilitating a workflow-efficient [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT-based staging assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08005-y
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging

Durval C. Costa, Susana Vinga, Carla Oliveira, Francisco P. M. Oliveira et al.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging

Durval C. Costa, Susana Vinga, Carla Oliveira, Francisco P. M. Oliveira, Inês Moreira, Cláudia S. Constantino, Andrea DeCensi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate a deep-learning (DL)-based framework to automatically perform breast cancer (BC) metabolic staging on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT, and to assess agreement among DL-based, nuclear medicine (NM) physician-based, and clinical staging. METHODS: F]FDG avid lesions suspected of malignancy were segmented by an NM physician and classified into four key tumor regions: primary tumor (pT), regional axillary lymph nodes (ALN), extra-axillary locoregional nodes (extra-ALN), and distant metastases (dM). Data were split into training (n = 303) and testing (n = 100) sets using a stratified approach. Class-specific DL segmentation networks were developed. A post-processing pipeline was implemented to derive metabolic TNM staging from the DL-based segmentation. Using NM-based and clinical staging segmentation as reference, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for T, N, and M. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient (DC) and lesion detection (LD) metrics. NM-based metabolic staging was also compared with clinical staging. RESULTS: DL-based staging showed concordance with NM-based/clinical staging of 75/62%, 87/74%, and 83/82% for T, N, and M, respectively. For N3 (presence of extra-ALN) and M1 (presence of dM), where [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is particularly relevant, sensitivity/specificity of DL-based (NM-based reference) were 0.86/0.96, and 0.97/0.78, respectively. Segmentation performance was good to excellent for pT, ALN, and dM (median DC ≥ 0.83 and LD ≥ 0.78), and moderate for extra-ALN (median DC = 0.63 and LD ≥ 0.71). NM-based metabolic staging agreed with clinical staging in 63%, 80%, and 99% of cases for T, N, and M, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although expert supervision remains essential, the developed DL-based framework demonstrates potential as a supportive tool for metabolic staging in BC patients, facilitating a workflow-efficient [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT-based staging assessment.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Champalimaud Foundation (PT), Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT), University of Lisbon (PT)
Fundação Champalimaud, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.