California’s prohibition of flavoured tobacco sales and the tobacco industry’s attempts to evade it

The tobacco industry has aggressively marketed menthol tobacco products because they are less harsh and more appealing to youth and other non-users. US law prohibits most flavours in tobacco products but exempts menthol from the ban. In 2020, California enacted a state law prohibiting retail sales of most flavoured tobacco products with ‘characterising flavours’, including menthol. Major tobacco companies vigorously opposed the law and sought its repeal. Despite spending millions of dollars to try to influence the legislature, ballot box and courts, the tobacco industry sought to evade the law by introducing so-called ‘non-menthol’ cigarettes. We describe those industry efforts and California’s responses: California law was amended to redefine illegal flavoured products to include those that create a ‘cooling sensation’ to consumers and established an unflavoured tobacco list making it illegal for retailers to sell flavoured products not on the list. The California experience described in our paper provides a case study demonstrating some best practices that can be replicated by other US states and localities and other countries consistent with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tobacco Control
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2026-060144
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

California’s prohibition of flavoured tobacco sales and the tobacco industry’s attempts to evade it

Lauren Kass Lempert, Stella Aguinaga Bialous, Pamela May Ling
Tobacco Control
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

California’s prohibition of flavoured tobacco sales and the tobacco industry’s attempts to evade it

Lauren Kass Lempert, Stella Aguinaga Bialous, Pamela May Ling
article en

Abstract

The tobacco industry has aggressively marketed menthol tobacco products because they are less harsh and more appealing to youth and other non-users. US law prohibits most flavours in tobacco products but exempts menthol from the ban. In 2020, California enacted a state law prohibiting retail sales of most flavoured tobacco products with ‘characterising flavours’, including menthol. Major tobacco companies vigorously opposed the law and sought its repeal. Despite spending millions of dollars to try to influence the legislature, ballot box and courts, the tobacco industry sought to evade the law by introducing so-called ‘non-menthol’ cigarettes. We describe those industry efforts and California’s responses: California law was amended to redefine illegal flavoured products to include those that create a ‘cooling sensation’ to consumers and established an unflavoured tobacco list making it illegal for retailers to sell flavoured products not on the list. The California experience described in our paper provides a case study demonstrating some best practices that can be replicated by other US states and localities and other countries consistent with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Tobacco Control
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.