Paleogene hydrothermal reworking of a cretaceous fluorite system: multi-stage fluorine hyper-enrichment at the Hushan Deposit, Southeastern China

The Hushan fluorite deposit in Suichang, Zhejiang Province, is a large, classic vein-type hydrothermal deposit within the giant South China fluorite metallogenic belt. This study reappraises its age and genesis by integrating fs -LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology, TIMS Sm-Nd dating, fluid inclusion microthermometry, C-H-O isotopes, and in-situ LA-ICP-MS trace-element profiling. Fluorite U-Pb and Sm-Nd dating yield ages of 39.1 ± 1.1 Ma (MSWD = 0.8) and 32.7 ± 2.6 Ma (MSWD = 15), respectively; together, they constrain a Paleogene hydrothermal interval of ca. 39–33 Ma, approximately 40 Myr younger than the previously accepted Late Cretaceous age of 70–80 Ma. The dated Paleogene overprint is expressed by two paragenetic fluorite stages: Stage 1 green fluorite is enriched in light rare earth elements, whereas Stage 2 colorless fluorite displays pronounced heavy rare earth elements enrichment. Both stages are characterized by negative Eu anomalies. The geochemical evolution from Stage 1 to Stage 2, together with cross-cutting and overgrowth textures, indicates remobilization and recrystallization during late hydrothermal activity. Fluid inclusions in fluorite homogenize mainly at 100–160 °C and have low salinities of approximately 1–4 wt% NaCl equiv., indicating a low-temperature, low-salinity NaCl-H 2 O hydrothermal system. Measured δD (mean –83.9‰), δ 18 O (mean –8.5‰), and δ 13 C (mean –12.0‰) values are inconsistent with a dominant magmatic-hydrothermal fluid and instead indicate a meteoric-water-dominated source. Strongly negative εNd(t) values (–7.3 to –6.9) and old two-stage Nd model ages (average T DM2 = 1426 Ma) further indicate that the ore-forming materials were derived mainly from the continental crust. We therefore argue that the Hushan deposit is not the product of a single Cretaceous event, but instead records at least two stages of evolution: initial Late Cretaceous fluorite mineralization followed by a Paleogene overprint that drove substantial enrichment. During the Paleogene (39–33 Ma), deeply circulated, heated meteoric water dissolved and reprecipitated pre-existing Cretaceous fluorite along reactivated fault arrays, resulting in fluorine hyper-enrichment. This recognition provides a critical basis for reinterpreting the multi-phase, multi-stage metallogenic architecture of the giant South China fluorite belt.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2026.107394
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paleogene hydrothermal reworking of a cretaceous fluorite system: multi-stage fluorine hyper-enrichment at the Hushan Deposit, Southeastern China

Huawen Cao, Feiping Wang, J Zhang, Hao Zou et al.
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Paleogene hydrothermal reworking of a cretaceous fluorite system: multi-stage fluorine hyper-enrichment at the Hushan Deposit, Southeastern China

Huawen Cao, Feiping Wang, J Zhang, Hao Zou, Feiyang Yao, Tang Yanwen, Zhili Ma, Gangyang Zhang, Haifeng Chen, Yuandong Liu, Zhen Wang, Haoran Chen, Jing Jing, Dongyang Xiao
article en

Abstract

The Hushan fluorite deposit in Suichang, Zhejiang Province, is a large, classic vein-type hydrothermal deposit within the giant South China fluorite metallogenic belt. This study reappraises its age and genesis by integrating fs -LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology, TIMS Sm-Nd dating, fluid inclusion microthermometry, C-H-O isotopes, and in-situ LA-ICP-MS trace-element profiling. Fluorite U-Pb and Sm-Nd dating yield ages of 39.1 ± 1.1 Ma (MSWD = 0.8) and 32.7 ± 2.6 Ma (MSWD = 15), respectively; together, they constrain a Paleogene hydrothermal interval of ca. 39–33 Ma, approximately 40 Myr younger than the previously accepted Late Cretaceous age of 70–80 Ma. The dated Paleogene overprint is expressed by two paragenetic fluorite stages: Stage 1 green fluorite is enriched in light rare earth elements, whereas Stage 2 colorless fluorite displays pronounced heavy rare earth elements enrichment. Both stages are characterized by negative Eu anomalies. The geochemical evolution from Stage 1 to Stage 2, together with cross-cutting and overgrowth textures, indicates remobilization and recrystallization during late hydrothermal activity. Fluid inclusions in fluorite homogenize mainly at 100–160 °C and have low salinities of approximately 1–4 wt% NaCl equiv., indicating a low-temperature, low-salinity NaCl-H 2 O hydrothermal system. Measured δD (mean –83.9‰), δ 18 O (mean –8.5‰), and δ 13 C (mean –12.0‰) values are inconsistent with a dominant magmatic-hydrothermal fluid and instead indicate a meteoric-water-dominated source. Strongly negative εNd(t) values (–7.3 to –6.9) and old two-stage Nd model ages (average T DM2 = 1426 Ma) further indicate that the ore-forming materials were derived mainly from the continental crust. We therefore argue that the Hushan deposit is not the product of a single Cretaceous event, but instead records at least two stages of evolution: initial Late Cretaceous fluorite mineralization followed by a Paleogene overprint that drove substantial enrichment. During the Paleogene (39–33 Ma), deeply circulated, heated meteoric water dissolved and reprecipitated pre-existing Cretaceous fluorite along reactivated fault arrays, resulting in fluorine hyper-enrichment. This recognition provides a critical basis for reinterpreting the multi-phase, multi-stage metallogenic architecture of the giant South China fluorite belt.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 195
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Chengdu University of Technology (CN), State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (CN), Institute of Geochemistry (CN), Zhejiang Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.