Human capital and economic growth: a meta-analytic reassessment

Abstract This study conducts the first comprehensive quantitative meta-analysis of the human capital–economic growth nexus, combining 740 effect-size estimates from 51 empirical studies published between 1991 and 2023. The aggregate evidence indicates a positive but modest relationship: on average, a 1% increase in human capital is associated with a 0.13% rise in output growth, which declines to 0.09% after correcting for publication bias. Considerable heterogeneity emerges across studies, driven primarily by measurement choices, country context, and econometric methodology. Education- and experience-based indicators yield larger effects than health proxies, while quality-oriented measures (e.g. test scores) display unexpectedly weaker associations with economic growth. The estimated impact is substantially stronger in Asia and in low- and middle-income economies, but weaker or insignificant in OECD countries, suggesting diminishing returns to human capital accumulation with development. Studies employing advanced econometric techniques (e.g. GMM, ARDL) report smaller but more robust coefficients. Overall, the findings underscore that human capital investment promotes economic growth, although its effectiveness critically depends on how it is measured, accumulated, and embedded within institutional contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Economic Development
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-026-00510-y
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human capital and economic growth: a meta-analytic reassessment

Aurora A.C. Teixeira, A L Quinta Gomes
Journal of Social and Economic Development
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

Human capital and economic growth: a meta-analytic reassessment

Aurora A.C. Teixeira, A L Quinta Gomes
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study conducts the first comprehensive quantitative meta-analysis of the human capital–economic growth nexus, combining 740 effect-size estimates from 51 empirical studies published between 1991 and 2023. The aggregate evidence indicates a positive but modest relationship: on average, a 1% increase in human capital is associated with a 0.13% rise in output growth, which declines to 0.09% after correcting for publication bias. Considerable heterogeneity emerges across studies, driven primarily by measurement choices, country context, and econometric methodology. Education- and experience-based indicators yield larger effects than health proxies, while quality-oriented measures (e.g. test scores) display unexpectedly weaker associations with economic growth. The estimated impact is substantially stronger in Asia and in low- and middle-income economies, but weaker or insignificant in OECD countries, suggesting diminishing returns to human capital accumulation with development. Studies employing advanced econometric techniques (e.g. GMM, ARDL) report smaller but more robust coefficients. Overall, the findings underscore that human capital investment promotes economic growth, although its effectiveness critically depends on how it is measured, accumulated, and embedded within institutional contexts.

Journal of Social and Economic Development
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.