Radiological Alignment Trajectories and Late Functional Outcomes After Three-Level ACDF: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Background: Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely used for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease; however, the relationship between postoperative alignment trajectories, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and late patient-reported outcomes remains incompletely defined. This study evaluated plane-specific radiological alignment changes, MRI-based ASD, and late functional outcomes in a homogeneous three-level ACDF cohort. Methods: This single-center observational cohort included 29 patients who underwent three-level ACDF between January 2018 and December 2023 and had complete radiographic follow-up. Radiological data were collected retrospectively from institutional records and imaging archives. Cervical sagittal and coronal alignment were assessed using Cobb angles on radiographs obtained preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. ASD was evaluated at the superior adjacent segment on 2-year MRI. Late patient-reported clinical outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 42.6 ± 6.8 months using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Results: Sagittal Cobb angle changed significantly over time (χ2(3) = 12.60, p = 0.006; Kendall’s W = 0.145), whereas coronal Cobb angle showed a statistically significant reduction over time, although the absolute magnitude of change was small (χ2(3) = 28.74, p < 0.001; Kendall’s W = 0.330). Lower sagittal Cobb angle correlated with worse NDI (r = −0.46, p = 0.004), and greater coronal Cobb angle correlated with worse physical activity scores (r = 0.52, p = 0.006). Higher Pfirrmann grade correlated with worse NDI (r = 0.49, p = 0.004) and pain scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.021). In exploratory regression analysis, sagittal Cobb angle and Pfirrmann grade were retained in the model for NDI, but these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Conclusions: After three-level ACDF, sagittal and coronal alignment followed different postoperative trajectories. Lower sagittal alignment and greater adjacent disc degeneration were associated with worse late neck-related disability. However, given the modest sample size and exploratory nature of the regression analysis, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm whether sagittal alignment and MRI-based adjacent segment degeneration independently contribute to late functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124739
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiological Alignment Trajectories and Late Functional Outcomes After Three-Level ACDF: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Oğuzhan Yılmaz, Ukbe Şırayder, Merdan Orunoğlu, Murat Baloglu
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Radiological Alignment Trajectories and Late Functional Outcomes After Three-Level ACDF: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Oğuzhan Yılmaz, Ukbe Şırayder, Merdan Orunoğlu, Murat Baloglu
article en

Abstract

Background: Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely used for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease; however, the relationship between postoperative alignment trajectories, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and late patient-reported outcomes remains incompletely defined. This study evaluated plane-specific radiological alignment changes, MRI-based ASD, and late functional outcomes in a homogeneous three-level ACDF cohort. Methods: This single-center observational cohort included 29 patients who underwent three-level ACDF between January 2018 and December 2023 and had complete radiographic follow-up. Radiological data were collected retrospectively from institutional records and imaging archives. Cervical sagittal and coronal alignment were assessed using Cobb angles on radiographs obtained preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. ASD was evaluated at the superior adjacent segment on 2-year MRI. Late patient-reported clinical outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 42.6 ± 6.8 months using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Results: Sagittal Cobb angle changed significantly over time (χ2(3) = 12.60, p = 0.006; Kendall’s W = 0.145), whereas coronal Cobb angle showed a statistically significant reduction over time, although the absolute magnitude of change was small (χ2(3) = 28.74, p < 0.001; Kendall’s W = 0.330). Lower sagittal Cobb angle correlated with worse NDI (r = −0.46, p = 0.004), and greater coronal Cobb angle correlated with worse physical activity scores (r = 0.52, p = 0.006). Higher Pfirrmann grade correlated with worse NDI (r = 0.49, p = 0.004) and pain scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.021). In exploratory regression analysis, sagittal Cobb angle and Pfirrmann grade were retained in the model for NDI, but these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Conclusions: After three-level ACDF, sagittal and coronal alignment followed different postoperative trajectories. Lower sagittal alignment and greater adjacent disc degeneration were associated with worse late neck-related disability. However, given the modest sample size and exploratory nature of the regression analysis, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm whether sagittal alignment and MRI-based adjacent segment degeneration independently contribute to late functional outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(12)
Nuh Naci Yazgan University (TR), Eskişehir City Hospital (TR), Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.