Past, Present, and Future of Evaluating Diastolic Function

The assessment of left ventricular diastolic function started with invasive pressure measurements and is currently primarily based on echocardiographic imaging. The current approach to the diagnosis of diastolic function relies on mitral inflow velocities, tissue Doppler early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus, peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary vein flow, left atrial size and function, and the noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure. The recommended algorithm in the 2025 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines for estimation of mean left atrial pressure has been validated in a large multicenter study that included 951 patients. Further, that algorithm has shown incremental value to triaging clinical scores in achieving accurate heart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis, against the invasive gold standard. Newer promising approaches have been developed over the past few years to study left ventricular diastolic function, including shear wave propagation velocity, left atrial conduit volume, and timing of mitral and tricuspid valve opening in the apical 4-chamber view. Artificial intelligence has been applied to this field as a rule-based decision tree algorithm, and as deep-learning neural networks to train models for diagnosing and grading diastolic dysfunction, and for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.125.018986
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Past, Present, and Future of Evaluating Diastolic Function

Sherif F. Nagueh
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Past, Present, and Future of Evaluating Diastolic Function

Sherif F. Nagueh
article en

Abstract

The assessment of left ventricular diastolic function started with invasive pressure measurements and is currently primarily based on echocardiographic imaging. The current approach to the diagnosis of diastolic function relies on mitral inflow velocities, tissue Doppler early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus, peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary vein flow, left atrial size and function, and the noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure. The recommended algorithm in the 2025 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines for estimation of mean left atrial pressure has been validated in a large multicenter study that included 951 patients. Further, that algorithm has shown incremental value to triaging clinical scores in achieving accurate heart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis, against the invasive gold standard. Newer promising approaches have been developed over the past few years to study left ventricular diastolic function, including shear wave propagation velocity, left atrial conduit volume, and timing of mitral and tricuspid valve opening in the apical 4-chamber view. Artificial intelligence has been applied to this field as a rule-based decision tree algorithm, and as deep-learning neural networks to train models for diagnosing and grading diastolic dysfunction, and for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Houston Methodist (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.