Quantifying effects of the European Health Data Space on the app ecosystem and data access

Access to patient-generated health data from mobile apps and wearables is increasingly central to connected care. The European Health Data Space (EHDS) introduces app providers as health data holders with obligations to share data for patient care and secondary use. We mapped EHDS health data holder criteria and applied them to a systematic review of 100 health apps, using privacy policies and related public sources to identify disclosed health data types and processing purposes. Overall, 18% of apps could qualify under the Personal Health Data Pathway and 21% under the Anonymous Health Data Pathway. Extrapolated to the currently globally available 337,000 health apps in app stores, more than 60,700 and 70,800 app providers could qualify. This suggests that a substantial share of consumer health apps may become integrated into the regulated EHDS secondary-use ecosystem. The scale of data availability will depend on enforcement and how providers adapt their data practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02917-7
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying effects of the European Health Data Space on the app ecosystem and data access

Sven Hetmank, Oscar Freyer, Stefanie Brückner, Kyra FRITSCH et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Quantifying effects of the European Health Data Space on the app ecosystem and data access

Sven Hetmank, Oscar Freyer, Stefanie Brückner, Kyra FRITSCH, Ronja Riedel, Stephen Gilbert
article en

Abstract

Access to patient-generated health data from mobile apps and wearables is increasingly central to connected care. The European Health Data Space (EHDS) introduces app providers as health data holders with obligations to share data for patient care and secondary use. We mapped EHDS health data holder criteria and applied them to a systematic review of 100 health apps, using privacy policies and related public sources to identify disclosed health data types and processing purposes. Overall, 18% of apps could qualify under the Personal Health Data Pathway and 21% under the Anonymous Health Data Pathway. Extrapolated to the currently globally available 337,000 health apps in app stores, more than 60,700 and 70,800 app providers could qualify. This suggests that a substantial share of consumer health apps may become integrated into the regulated EHDS secondary-use ecosystem. The scale of data availability will depend on enforcement and how providers adapt their data practices.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 9(1)
Dresden International University (DE), Fresenius (Germany) (DE), Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
European Commission, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.