Probation, Parole, and Harm Reduction: An Exploratory Study of Responses to Clients Carrying Naloxone

Individuals on community supervision in the U.S. face elevated risk of fatal opioid overdoses, positioning probation and parole officers (POs) as essential actors in harm-reduction efforts, including clients’ possession of Naloxone. Yet prior research has found that clients fear that carrying Naloxone could lead to negative consequences. This qualitative study examines POs’ (n = 109) actual and hypothetical responses to clients’ possession of Naloxone and agency policies that guide these decisions. Findings indicate promise and gaps; many officers reported supportive attitudes of clients carrying Naloxone, though some hypothetical responses revealed the possibility of stigma or responses that could be perceived as punitive. Together, these results underscore the need for standardized policies and further research to reduce ambiguity and address barriers to Naloxone access for individuals on supervision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corrections
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2026.2688817
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probation, Parole, and Harm Reduction: An Exploratory Study of Responses to Clients Carrying Naloxone

Linsey A. Belisle, Tereza Trejbalová, Magalli Morado Landaverde, Kimberly Kras et al.
Corrections
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Probation, Parole, and Harm Reduction: An Exploratory Study of Responses to Clients Carrying Naloxone

Linsey A. Belisle, Tereza Trejbalová, Magalli Morado Landaverde, Kimberly Kras, Blake Nordstrom
article en

Abstract

Individuals on community supervision in the U.S. face elevated risk of fatal opioid overdoses, positioning probation and parole officers (POs) as essential actors in harm-reduction efforts, including clients’ possession of Naloxone. Yet prior research has found that clients fear that carrying Naloxone could lead to negative consequences. This qualitative study examines POs’ (n = 109) actual and hypothetical responses to clients’ possession of Naloxone and agency policies that guide these decisions. Findings indicate promise and gaps; many officers reported supportive attitudes of clients carrying Naloxone, though some hypothetical responses revealed the possibility of stigma or responses that could be perceived as punitive. Together, these results underscore the need for standardized policies and further research to reduce ambiguity and address barriers to Naloxone access for individuals on supervision.

Corrections
Boise State University (US), San Diego State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.