Real-time identification of aetiology in patients able to undergo transoesophageal echocardiography with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China: a prospective, single-centre exploratory study

Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in China has a high incidence and poor survival, highlighting an urgent need for rapid identification of reversible aetiologies. Conventional transthoracic echocardiography during resuscitation can be limited by imaging quality and prolonged chest compression interruptions. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a feasible alternative that allows for continuous real-time imaging during compressions, but its utility in Chinese OHCA patients remains uncertain. Methods This prospective, single-centre exploratory study enrolled 45 consecutive selected adults with non-traumatic OHCA (NT-OHCA) of unclear aetiology who were eligible for TEE. Of all enrolled patients, 43 completed standardised TEE image acquisition, while 2 cases with TEE-unrecognisable aetiology were excluded from aetiological analysis. The per-protocol analysis finally included 41 patients in whom TEE was successfully completed. Certified emergency physicians performed simplified TEE examinations (five standard views) during active resuscitation. Door-to-TEE interval, diagnostic yield, TEE-guided interventions and clinical outcomes were recorded according to Utstein guidelines. Results TEE yielded diagnostic-quality images in all patients (43/43), with a median door-to-TEE time of 13 min (IQR: 6.5–22). Reversible aetiologies were identified in 39.0% (16/41), most commonly acute aortic dissection (50.0%, 8/16), followed by massive pulmonary embolism (25.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18.8%) and hypovolaemia (6.3%). TEE guided interventions in 56.3% (9/16) of identified cases. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 28-day survival rates were 41.5% and 12.2%, respectively, with no significant differences between aetiology-identified and unidentified groups (ROSC: 37.5% vs 44.0%, p>0.05; 28-day survival: 6.3% vs 16.0%, p>0.05). Sensitivity analysis of the 43-case complete imaging cohort and the total 45 enrolled cases further verified the stability and reliability of the diagnostic results. Conclusions During mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, TEE rapidly identified suspected aetiologies in 39% (16/41) of NT-OHCA cases, notably revealing frequent acute aortic dissections. Lacking a comparator group, TEE’s feasibility as a complementary tool requires further controlled investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215837
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-time identification of aetiology in patients able to undergo transoesophageal echocardiography with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China: a prospective, single-centre exploratory study

Liren Lai, Penghui Du, Jiyan Lin, Xiong Liu et al.
Emergency Medicine Journal
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Real-time identification of aetiology in patients able to undergo transoesophageal echocardiography with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China: a prospective, single-centre exploratory study

Liren Lai, Penghui Du, Jiyan Lin, Xiong Liu, Qingliu Zheng, Siyao Liu
article en

Abstract

Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in China has a high incidence and poor survival, highlighting an urgent need for rapid identification of reversible aetiologies. Conventional transthoracic echocardiography during resuscitation can be limited by imaging quality and prolonged chest compression interruptions. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a feasible alternative that allows for continuous real-time imaging during compressions, but its utility in Chinese OHCA patients remains uncertain. Methods This prospective, single-centre exploratory study enrolled 45 consecutive selected adults with non-traumatic OHCA (NT-OHCA) of unclear aetiology who were eligible for TEE. Of all enrolled patients, 43 completed standardised TEE image acquisition, while 2 cases with TEE-unrecognisable aetiology were excluded from aetiological analysis. The per-protocol analysis finally included 41 patients in whom TEE was successfully completed. Certified emergency physicians performed simplified TEE examinations (five standard views) during active resuscitation. Door-to-TEE interval, diagnostic yield, TEE-guided interventions and clinical outcomes were recorded according to Utstein guidelines. Results TEE yielded diagnostic-quality images in all patients (43/43), with a median door-to-TEE time of 13 min (IQR: 6.5–22). Reversible aetiologies were identified in 39.0% (16/41), most commonly acute aortic dissection (50.0%, 8/16), followed by massive pulmonary embolism (25.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18.8%) and hypovolaemia (6.3%). TEE guided interventions in 56.3% (9/16) of identified cases. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 28-day survival rates were 41.5% and 12.2%, respectively, with no significant differences between aetiology-identified and unidentified groups (ROSC: 37.5% vs 44.0%, p>0.05; 28-day survival: 6.3% vs 16.0%, p>0.05). Sensitivity analysis of the 43-case complete imaging cohort and the total 45 enrolled cases further verified the stability and reliability of the diagnostic results. Conclusions During mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, TEE rapidly identified suspected aetiologies in 39% (16/41) of NT-OHCA cases, notably revealing frequent acute aortic dissections. Lacking a comparator group, TEE’s feasibility as a complementary tool requires further controlled investigation.

Emergency Medicine Journal
Xiamen University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.