School well-being in high school students: Gender and school level differences

Adolescent well-being is increasingly recognized as a crucial aspect of public health, with significant implications for both present and future societal outcomes. This study investigates gender and school-level differences in adolescents’ school well-being, using a multidimensional approach. The sample consisted of 1322 high school students, who filled in the School Well-being Questionnaire (QBS; Tobia & Marzocchi, 2015), originally created for primary and middle school students. As a first result, the factorial structure of the QBS remained valid for adolescents, with satisfactory fit indices. Gender and school-level analyses indicated significant differences in various dimensions of school well-being. Females reported higher satisfaction with their school results, while males scored higher in Relationships with Classmates, Emotional Attitude in School, and Sense of Self-Efficacy. Moreover, students in the triennial (11th–13th grade) period reported lower overall school well-being compared to their counterparts attending the biennial period (9th–10th grade). This study underscores the importance of assessing adolescent well-being within the school context and provides valuable insights into gender and age-related disparities. The findings offer a basis for developing gender and age-specific interventions aimed at promoting adolescent well-being, highlighting the need for targeted support mechanisms to address the diverse needs of high school students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of School & Educational Psychology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2026.2689311
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

School well-being in high school students: Gender and school level differences

Gian Marco Marzocchi, Martina Lattanzi, Anna Ogliari, Valentina Tobia et al.
International Journal of School & Educational Psychology
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

School well-being in high school students: Gender and school level differences

Gian Marco Marzocchi, Martina Lattanzi, Anna Ogliari, Valentina Tobia, Michela Moretti
article en

Abstract

Adolescent well-being is increasingly recognized as a crucial aspect of public health, with significant implications for both present and future societal outcomes. This study investigates gender and school-level differences in adolescents’ school well-being, using a multidimensional approach. The sample consisted of 1322 high school students, who filled in the School Well-being Questionnaire (QBS; Tobia & Marzocchi, 2015), originally created for primary and middle school students. As a first result, the factorial structure of the QBS remained valid for adolescents, with satisfactory fit indices. Gender and school-level analyses indicated significant differences in various dimensions of school well-being. Females reported higher satisfaction with their school results, while males scored higher in Relationships with Classmates, Emotional Attitude in School, and Sense of Self-Efficacy. Moreover, students in the triennial (11th–13th grade) period reported lower overall school well-being compared to their counterparts attending the biennial period (9th–10th grade). This study underscores the importance of assessing adolescent well-being within the school context and provides valuable insights into gender and age-related disparities. The findings offer a basis for developing gender and age-specific interventions aimed at promoting adolescent well-being, highlighting the need for targeted support mechanisms to address the diverse needs of high school students.

International Journal of School & Educational Psychology
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.