Machine learning for adhesion assessment and prediction

Adhesion is governed by a combination of several chemical and physicochemical interactions at the coating-substrate interface. Traditional adhesion experiments are often resource-intensive and provide limited insights into the multiple factors influencing adhesion outcomes. Recent studies have applied machine learning (ML) methods to the modelling and prediction of adhesion properties, and this review examines existing ML approaches for adhesion assessment across coatings and adhesive systems. Here, published studies are analysed in terms of dataset size and quality, feature selection strategies, ML model choice, validation practices, and reported performance metrics. In doing so, we highlight common limitations, including small and heterogeneous datasets, limited use of independent test sets, and inconsistent adhesion testing protocols, which frequently lead to overestimated predictive performance. We also re-evaluate selected case studies to illustrate how data handling choices and experimental design can influence model accuracy and generalizability. Based on these observations, we identify key challenges and opportunities for data-driven adhesion modelling and provide recommendations to improve data transparency, incorporate chemically meaningful descriptors, and adopt robust validation frameworks. The review concludes by outlining future directions for integrating ML with experimental design to support more reliable and scalable adhesion prediction for advanced coating and adhesive applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2026.2687662
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for adhesion assessment and prediction

Tu C. Le, Stuart Bateman, Priya Subramanian, Daniel Kaminski et al.
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Machine learning for adhesion assessment and prediction

Tu C. Le, Stuart Bateman, Priya Subramanian, Daniel Kaminski, Dang-Nhat Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Adhesion is governed by a combination of several chemical and physicochemical interactions at the coating-substrate interface. Traditional adhesion experiments are often resource-intensive and provide limited insights into the multiple factors influencing adhesion outcomes. Recent studies have applied machine learning (ML) methods to the modelling and prediction of adhesion properties, and this review examines existing ML approaches for adhesion assessment across coatings and adhesive systems. Here, published studies are analysed in terms of dataset size and quality, feature selection strategies, ML model choice, validation practices, and reported performance metrics. In doing so, we highlight common limitations, including small and heterogeneous datasets, limited use of independent test sets, and inconsistent adhesion testing protocols, which frequently lead to overestimated predictive performance. We also re-evaluate selected case studies to illustrate how data handling choices and experimental design can influence model accuracy and generalizability. Based on these observations, we identify key challenges and opportunities for data-driven adhesion modelling and provide recommendations to improve data transparency, incorporate chemically meaningful descriptors, and adopt robust validation frameworks. The review concludes by outlining future directions for integrating ML with experimental design to support more reliable and scalable adhesion prediction for advanced coating and adhesive applications.

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
Omron (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.