Global banking sector responses to the Israel–Hamas conflict: an international perspective

This study aims to examine market reactions in the banking sector by market and region during the Israel-Hamas conflict. Moreover, we also explore the influence of sovereign risk and corporate characteristics on market reactions during the conflict. We analyzed a sample of 1,115 companies operating in the banking sector, using cumulative abnormal returns as a measure of market reaction. The results indicate that the banking sector exhibits a significant negative market reaction to the Israel-Hamas conflict. This finding is more pronounced in developed and emerging markets. By region, this finding is more pronounced in the Americas, the Middle East, and Asia. Additionally, sovereign risk exerts a significant negative impact on market reactions during announcement periods. This study contributes to the geopolitical finance literature by providing firm-level evidence from the global banking sector and highlighting heterogeneous market responses across market classifications, regions, and sovereign risk conditions during geopolitical conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Economics & Finance
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2026.2689270
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global banking sector responses to the Israel–Hamas conflict: an international perspective

William Ginn, İbrahim Halil Ekşi̇, Rizky Yudaruddin, Felisitas Defung et al.
Cogent Economics & Finance
Belt and Road Initiative
article

Global banking sector responses to the Israel–Hamas conflict: an international perspective

William Ginn, İbrahim Halil Ekşi̇, Rizky Yudaruddin, Felisitas Defung, Dadang Lesmana
article en

Abstract

This study aims to examine market reactions in the banking sector by market and region during the Israel-Hamas conflict. Moreover, we also explore the influence of sovereign risk and corporate characteristics on market reactions during the conflict. We analyzed a sample of 1,115 companies operating in the banking sector, using cumulative abnormal returns as a measure of market reaction. The results indicate that the banking sector exhibits a significant negative market reaction to the Israel-Hamas conflict. This finding is more pronounced in developed and emerging markets. By region, this finding is more pronounced in the Americas, the Middle East, and Asia. Additionally, sovereign risk exerts a significant negative impact on market reactions during announcement periods. This study contributes to the geopolitical finance literature by providing firm-level evidence from the global banking sector and highlighting heterogeneous market responses across market classifications, regions, and sovereign risk conditions during geopolitical conflict.

Cogent Economics & FinanceVol. 14(1)
Coburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development (ID), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Mulawarman University (ID), Gaziantep University (TR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.