Projected Outcomes of Reducing Federal Funding for Syringe Service Programs via Executive Order

Importance: Syringe service programs (SSPs) deliver evidence-based harm reduction interventions to persons who inject drugs to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population, including syringe exchange, naloxone distribution, linkage to medications for opioid use disorder, and other services. In July 2025, a federal executive order threatened federal support for SSPs in the US. Objective: To estimate the potential long-term outcomes of halting federal funding for SSPs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This decision analytical model study used a closed cohort microsimulation model of the natural history of injection drug use and health outcomes among persons who inject drugs in the US from August 1, 2025, to August 2030. The model was populated with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system and published data to create representative cohorts of persons who inject drugs nationwide. Exposure: Cases in which total funding for SSPs was reduced by 11% and 80% were modeled. Within each case, 3 potential scenarios related to federal funding disruptions due to an executive order threatening funding for SSPs were modeled: (1) funding disruptions remain in place for 5 years, through August 2030; (2) funding returns to previous levels after 1 year, in August 2026; and (3) funding returns to 100% of previous levels in January 2029. Main Outcomes: The primary outcome was 5-year all-cause and overdose mortality and nonfatal overdoses. Results: In a hypothetical study population of 3 694 500 persons who inject drugs (57.0% male; mean [SD] age, 49.5 [17.5] years), all-cause mortality increased by 0.1% (95% credible interval [CrI], 0-0.2%) to 5.0% (95% CrI, 0-0.8%), overdose mortality increased by 0.2% (95% CrI, -0.1% to 0.4%) to 6.9% (95% CrI, -4.3% to 14.4%), and nonfatal overdoses decreased by 0.1% (95% CrI, -0.2% to 0) to 4.2% (95% CrI, -7.8% to 0.1%) during 5 years across all scenarios. The worst-case scenario, in which there was sustained high levels of service disruption, resulted in 39 600 additional deaths and 15 600 additional overdose deaths among persons who inject drugs in the US. All-cause mortality and overdose mortality increased in most sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this decision analytical model study estimating the effects of reducing federal funding for SSPs, the findings suggest that mortality will increase among persons who inject drugs during the 5 years after loss of funding. Future studies are needed to understand clinical effects of funding changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.19402
Primary Topic
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Projected Outcomes of Reducing Federal Funding for Syringe Service Programs via Executive Order

Joshua A. Barocas, Pranav Padmanabhan, Tyler S. Bartholomew, Kathleen Joseph et al.
JAMA Network Open
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
article

Projected Outcomes of Reducing Federal Funding for Syringe Service Programs via Executive Order

Joshua A. Barocas, Pranav Padmanabhan, Tyler S. Bartholomew, Kathleen Joseph, Xiaoyu Guan, G.L. Day, Kirk B. Fetters, Marina Plesons, Lauren Kerr, Kristina Yamkovoy, Sarah E. Scott, Hansel E. Tookes, Alia Al-Tayyib
article en

Abstract

Importance: Syringe service programs (SSPs) deliver evidence-based harm reduction interventions to persons who inject drugs to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population, including syringe exchange, naloxone distribution, linkage to medications for opioid use disorder, and other services. In July 2025, a federal executive order threatened federal support for SSPs in the US. Objective: To estimate the potential long-term outcomes of halting federal funding for SSPs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This decision analytical model study used a closed cohort microsimulation model of the natural history of injection drug use and health outcomes among persons who inject drugs in the US from August 1, 2025, to August 2030. The model was populated with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system and published data to create representative cohorts of persons who inject drugs nationwide. Exposure: Cases in which total funding for SSPs was reduced by 11% and 80% were modeled. Within each case, 3 potential scenarios related to federal funding disruptions due to an executive order threatening funding for SSPs were modeled: (1) funding disruptions remain in place for 5 years, through August 2030; (2) funding returns to previous levels after 1 year, in August 2026; and (3) funding returns to 100% of previous levels in January 2029. Main Outcomes: The primary outcome was 5-year all-cause and overdose mortality and nonfatal overdoses. Results: In a hypothetical study population of 3 694 500 persons who inject drugs (57.0% male; mean [SD] age, 49.5 [17.5] years), all-cause mortality increased by 0.1% (95% credible interval [CrI], 0-0.2%) to 5.0% (95% CrI, 0-0.8%), overdose mortality increased by 0.2% (95% CrI, -0.1% to 0.4%) to 6.9% (95% CrI, -4.3% to 14.4%), and nonfatal overdoses decreased by 0.1% (95% CrI, -0.2% to 0) to 4.2% (95% CrI, -7.8% to 0.1%) during 5 years across all scenarios. The worst-case scenario, in which there was sustained high levels of service disruption, resulted in 39 600 additional deaths and 15 600 additional overdose deaths among persons who inject drugs in the US. All-cause mortality and overdose mortality increased in most sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this decision analytical model study estimating the effects of reducing federal funding for SSPs, the findings suggest that mortality will increase among persons who inject drugs during the 5 years after loss of funding. Future studies are needed to understand clinical effects of funding changes.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(6)
University of Miami (US), Colorado School of Public Health (US), Denver Health Medical Center (US), Denver Public Health (US), Health and Hospital Corporation (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.