Postinstalled Bars for Minimally Invasive Widening of Reinforced Concrete Bridges: Experimental Investigations on Bond-Splitting Failure

One of the methods to address traffic congestion problems is to widen existing concrete bridge slabs. This is traditionally done by partly demolishing concrete and exposing the internal reinforcement to form lap splices with starter bars that can be used to form the connection with the new reinforcement in the extended parts of the slabs. In this work, an alternative, minimally invasive solution is explored that consists of installing postinstalled reinforcing bars (chemical anchoring system) to act as starter bars for the extended portion of the slab. The concept involves making a diamond saw cut in the existing slab to visualize the exact location of the existing reinforcement, installing the postinstalled reinforcement close to the existing reinforcement and using it as starter bars, facilitating lap splices with reinforcement in new concrete. For safe designs, the embedment length of the bars should be sufficient to provide the required resistance. Current design standards such as ACI 318-19 allow the use of postinstalled bars if they meet ACI 355.5 qualification requirements. If the postinstalled bar is qualified, then it can be designed as an equivalent cast-in straight bar, which requires a relatively large anchorage or development length. Alternatively, if the postinstalled bar is considered as an adhesive anchor, Chapter 17 provisions of ACI 318-19 can be used, which typically result in significantly lower embedment depths. The use of postinstalled bars for bridge extension purposes needs better understanding, given that a variety of mortars are available in the market and the performance of postinstalled bars under different conditions is still not fully understood. To address this, in this study, a total of 42 single pullout tests were conducted on postinstalled bars to investigate their performance and behavior. These specimen-level tests were conducted on relatively small specimens replicating bridge slab geometry, with realistic boundary conditions. This study examines the effects of embedment depth, internal bridge transverse and longitudinal reinforcement, concrete strength, bar grade, concrete cover, and adhesive type on the capacity and behavior of postinstalled bars. Based on the results of this and further studies being carried out by the authors, a new design method will be proposed for the safe design of anchorage of postinstalled bars with a focus on bridge extension applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-8077
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postinstalled Bars for Minimally Invasive Widening of Reinforced Concrete Bridges: Experimental Investigations on Bond-Splitting Failure

Akanshu Sharma, Prince Baah, Dheeraj Waghmare
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Postinstalled Bars for Minimally Invasive Widening of Reinforced Concrete Bridges: Experimental Investigations on Bond-Splitting Failure

Akanshu Sharma, Prince Baah, Dheeraj Waghmare
article en

Abstract

One of the methods to address traffic congestion problems is to widen existing concrete bridge slabs. This is traditionally done by partly demolishing concrete and exposing the internal reinforcement to form lap splices with starter bars that can be used to form the connection with the new reinforcement in the extended parts of the slabs. In this work, an alternative, minimally invasive solution is explored that consists of installing postinstalled reinforcing bars (chemical anchoring system) to act as starter bars for the extended portion of the slab. The concept involves making a diamond saw cut in the existing slab to visualize the exact location of the existing reinforcement, installing the postinstalled reinforcement close to the existing reinforcement and using it as starter bars, facilitating lap splices with reinforcement in new concrete. For safe designs, the embedment length of the bars should be sufficient to provide the required resistance. Current design standards such as ACI 318-19 allow the use of postinstalled bars if they meet ACI 355.5 qualification requirements. If the postinstalled bar is qualified, then it can be designed as an equivalent cast-in straight bar, which requires a relatively large anchorage or development length. Alternatively, if the postinstalled bar is considered as an adhesive anchor, Chapter 17 provisions of ACI 318-19 can be used, which typically result in significantly lower embedment depths. The use of postinstalled bars for bridge extension purposes needs better understanding, given that a variety of mortars are available in the market and the performance of postinstalled bars under different conditions is still not fully understood. To address this, in this study, a total of 42 single pullout tests were conducted on postinstalled bars to investigate their performance and behavior. These specimen-level tests were conducted on relatively small specimens replicating bridge slab geometry, with realistic boundary conditions. This study examines the effects of embedment depth, internal bridge transverse and longitudinal reinforcement, concrete strength, bar grade, concrete cover, and adhesive type on the capacity and behavior of postinstalled bars. Based on the results of this and further studies being carried out by the authors, a new design method will be proposed for the safe design of anchorage of postinstalled bars with a focus on bridge extension applications.

Journal of Bridge EngineeringVol. 31(9)
Indiana Department of Transportation (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Virginia Department of Transportation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.