Steering Information Disorder Nexus: A Power Theorisation

Abstract Information disorders such as disinformation, misinformation, polarization, and conspiracy theories on social media pose severe challenges for platforms, users, and institutions at large. There is a limited understanding of how power imbalances govern users’ interpretation of information on social media platforms. We address this asymmetry using Foucault’s power-knowledge lens and systemic episodic view of power. Using inductive top-down theorizng we identify reinforcing and resistance mechanisms at the individual, platform, and institutional level. Our propositions explain the mechanisms behind information acceptance, believability, and amplification, followed by resistance mechanisms, such as information evaluation and rejection. Our study advances IS scholarship by explaining bottom-up and top-down power embedding at the platform and institutional level. We also identify specific power techniques leveraged by authoritarian and democratic countries, through implicit and explicit application of power. Our study proposes policymakers and platforms as a collaborative unit to design robust interventions that minimize interpretation biases and information amplification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-026-10758-8
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steering Information Disorder Nexus: A Power Theorisation

Snehal Shah, Lakshay Mehla, Ashish Kumar Jha, Akshra Mehla
Information Systems Frontiers
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Steering Information Disorder Nexus: A Power Theorisation

Snehal Shah, Lakshay Mehla, Ashish Kumar Jha, Akshra Mehla
article en

Abstract

Abstract Information disorders such as disinformation, misinformation, polarization, and conspiracy theories on social media pose severe challenges for platforms, users, and institutions at large. There is a limited understanding of how power imbalances govern users’ interpretation of information on social media platforms. We address this asymmetry using Foucault’s power-knowledge lens and systemic episodic view of power. Using inductive top-down theorizng we identify reinforcing and resistance mechanisms at the individual, platform, and institutional level. Our propositions explain the mechanisms behind information acceptance, believability, and amplification, followed by resistance mechanisms, such as information evaluation and rejection. Our study advances IS scholarship by explaining bottom-up and top-down power embedding at the platform and institutional level. We also identify specific power techniques leveraged by authoritarian and democratic countries, through implicit and explicit application of power. Our study proposes policymakers and platforms as a collaborative unit to design robust interventions that minimize interpretation biases and information amplification.

Information Systems Frontiers
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.