Objectivity Killed the Cat? Navigating Conservation Ethics in Feral Cat Management in Australia

Feral cat management in Australia highlights tensions between traditional conservation and compassionate conservation. Drawing on 19 interviews and ethnographic research with practitioners involved in feral cat management, we examine how ethical complexities are navigated in practice and explore the potential to bridge the gap between these approaches. The article demonstrates that protecting biodiversity is reinforced as the default goal through institutional norms and appeals to scientific objectivity, while ethical disagreements are shifted into technical debates. Although practitioners share concerns about limited evidence and support less harmful measures, sustainable collaboration requires explicit normative deliberation about objectives, trade-offs, and acceptable harms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics Policy & Environment
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2026.2689881
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectivity Killed the Cat? Navigating Conservation Ethics in Feral Cat Management in Australia

Lowieke Vermeulen, Bernice Bovenkerk, Esther Turnhout
Ethics Policy & Environment
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Objectivity Killed the Cat? Navigating Conservation Ethics in Feral Cat Management in Australia

Lowieke Vermeulen, Bernice Bovenkerk, Esther Turnhout
article en

Abstract

Feral cat management in Australia highlights tensions between traditional conservation and compassionate conservation. Drawing on 19 interviews and ethnographic research with practitioners involved in feral cat management, we examine how ethical complexities are navigated in practice and explore the potential to bridge the gap between these approaches. The article demonstrates that protecting biodiversity is reinforced as the default goal through institutional norms and appeals to scientific objectivity, while ethical disagreements are shifted into technical debates. Although practitioners share concerns about limited evidence and support less harmful measures, sustainable collaboration requires explicit normative deliberation about objectives, trade-offs, and acceptable harms.

Ethics Policy & Environment
Wageningen University & Research (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Objectivity Killed the Cat? Navigating Conservation Ethics in Feral Cat Management in Australia — Lowieke Vermeulen, Bernice Bovenkerk, et al. · Ethics Policy & Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS