Underwater Endosocpic Mucosal Resection is a technique with a short learning curve - a multicentric prospective study (with video)

Introduction and Aims: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) emerged as a promising alternative to conventional EMR (C-EMR) for resecting large colorectal polyps. There is a lack of studies focusing on its learning curve. Thus, we aimed to determine the learning curve of U-EMR in endoscopists without prior experience in U-EMR. Methods: Four endoscopists from 4 different centres performed U-EMR after standardized online training. Patients with nonpedunculated colorectal lesions sized 10-30mm were enrolled between November 2023 and June 2024. The primary outcome was to evaluate technical success, en bloc resection rates, procedural time, and adverse events before and after 10 and 15 procedures, to assess whether this threshold is sufficient for proficiency. Results: Overall, 84 lesions were included, median size of 17mm [10-35mm]. Mean procedural time was 3.99 minutes, with an average of 1.21 piecemeal fragments per lesion, and en bloc resection rate was 85%, with all lesions completely resected. When comparing learning phases, en bloc resection rates were 83.3% in the first period (first 15 lesions) and 87.5% thereafter, with a slight reduction in mean procedural time (4.13 vs 3.77 minutes). There were no significant differences in procedural time or en bloc resection when comparing results after 10 or 15 procedures, no observed improvements after the 16th. No perforations, delayed bleeding, or hospital admissions. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 3.6% of cases, managed conservatively. Prophylactic clip closure was performed in 34.5% of cases, primarily in right colon. Conclusion: U-EMR is safe, efficient, and easily adopted, with proficiency that may be achieved after a small number of procedures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000553155
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underwater Endosocpic Mucosal Resection is a technique with a short learning curve - a multicentric prospective study (with video)

Mário Jorge Dinis-Ribeiro, María Manuela Estevinho, Isadora Rosa, Rui Mendo et al.
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Underwater Endosocpic Mucosal Resection is a technique with a short learning curve - a multicentric prospective study (with video)

Mário Jorge Dinis-Ribeiro, María Manuela Estevinho, Isadora Rosa, Rui Mendo, Luís Correia Gomes, Jaime Rodrigues, Tatiana Pacheco, Pimentel R.
article en

Abstract

Introduction and Aims: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) emerged as a promising alternative to conventional EMR (C-EMR) for resecting large colorectal polyps. There is a lack of studies focusing on its learning curve. Thus, we aimed to determine the learning curve of U-EMR in endoscopists without prior experience in U-EMR. Methods: Four endoscopists from 4 different centres performed U-EMR after standardized online training. Patients with nonpedunculated colorectal lesions sized 10-30mm were enrolled between November 2023 and June 2024. The primary outcome was to evaluate technical success, en bloc resection rates, procedural time, and adverse events before and after 10 and 15 procedures, to assess whether this threshold is sufficient for proficiency. Results: Overall, 84 lesions were included, median size of 17mm [10-35mm]. Mean procedural time was 3.99 minutes, with an average of 1.21 piecemeal fragments per lesion, and en bloc resection rate was 85%, with all lesions completely resected. When comparing learning phases, en bloc resection rates were 83.3% in the first period (first 15 lesions) and 87.5% thereafter, with a slight reduction in mean procedural time (4.13 vs 3.77 minutes). There were no significant differences in procedural time or en bloc resection when comparing results after 10 or 15 procedures, no observed improvements after the 16th. No perforations, delayed bleeding, or hospital admissions. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 3.6% of cases, managed conservatively. Prophylactic clip closure was performed in 34.5% of cases, primarily in right colon. Conclusion: U-EMR is safe, efficient, and easily adopted, with proficiency that may be achieved after a small number of procedures.

GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.