Thick Particular: Architecture as a Relational Entity in Armstrong's Ontology

Contemporary architectural discourse frequently treats the built object as a singular, context-independent entity—a tendency that, this paper argues, constitutes an ontological error. Drawing on D.M. Armstrong’s realist metaphysics, the paper proposes the concept of the thick particular as a corrective framework for understanding architectural existence. On this account, an architectural work is not merely a physical object but an entity constituted by a network of programmatic, contextual, temporal, collective, data-driven, and material-historical relations—relations that are not external additions but intrinsic to what the work is. Through conceptual analysis and the purposive selection of five case studies—Seattle Central Library, Parc de la Villette, Markthal Rotterdam, Prostho Museum Research Center, and CCTV Headquarters—the paper develops a seven-dimensional thickening framework and tests its discriminatory power. The analysis demonstrates that realist ontological frameworks, which have been largely unexplored in architecture theory, offer precise tools for distinguishing relationally constituted works from those whose iconic form suppresses or marginalises relational dimensions. The framework is advanced as a diagnostic and generative tool for practitioners committed to architecturally meaningful production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20739012
Primary Topic
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Thick Particular: Architecture as a Relational Entity in Armstrong's Ontology

Alireza Mostaghni
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
preprint

Thick Particular: Architecture as a Relational Entity in Armstrong's Ontology

Alireza Mostaghni
preprint en

Abstract

Contemporary architectural discourse frequently treats the built object as a singular, context-independent entity—a tendency that, this paper argues, constitutes an ontological error. Drawing on D.M. Armstrong’s realist metaphysics, the paper proposes the concept of the thick particular as a corrective framework for understanding architectural existence. On this account, an architectural work is not merely a physical object but an entity constituted by a network of programmatic, contextual, temporal, collective, data-driven, and material-historical relations—relations that are not external additions but intrinsic to what the work is. Through conceptual analysis and the purposive selection of five case studies—Seattle Central Library, Parc de la Villette, Markthal Rotterdam, Prostho Museum Research Center, and CCTV Headquarters—the paper develops a seven-dimensional thickening framework and tests its discriminatory power. The analysis demonstrates that realist ontological frameworks, which have been largely unexplored in architecture theory, offer precise tools for distinguishing relationally constituted works from those whose iconic form suppresses or marginalises relational dimensions. The framework is advanced as a diagnostic and generative tool for practitioners committed to architecturally meaningful production.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tehran University of Art (IR)
Reduced inequalities
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.